The role of parameter identification in finite element contact analyses with reference to orthopaedic biomechanics applications

References 

1. ANSYS-Manual, 1999. ANSYS Theory Reference Manual. SAS IP, Inc.
2. Baleani M, Cristofolini L, Toni A. Initial stability of a new hybrid fixation hip stem (experimental measurement of implant-bone micromotion under torsional load in comparison with cemented and cementless stems). Journal of Biomedical Material Resources. 2000;50:605–615
3. Bathe KJ. Finite Element Procedures. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1996;
4. Biegler F, Reuben J, Harrigan T, Hou F, JE A. Effect of porous coating and loading conditions on total hip femoral stem stability. Journal of Arthroplasty. 1995;10:839–847
5. Couteau B, Labey L, Hobatho MC, Vander Sloten J, Arlaud JY, Brignola JC. Validation of a three dimensional finite element model of a femur with a customized hip implant. In:  Middleton J,  Jones MJ,  Pande GN editor. Computer Methods in Biomechanics & Biomedical Engineering. Amsterdam: Gordon & Breach; 1998;p. 77–86
6. Hefzy MS, Singh SP. Comparison between two techniques for modelling interface conditions in a porous coated hip endoprosthesis. Medical Engineering and Physics. 1997;19:50–62
7. Kang YK, Park HC, Youm Y, Lee IK, Ahn MH, Ihn JC. Three dimensional shape reconstruction and finite element analysis of femur before and after the cementless type of total hip replacement. Journal of Biomedical Engineering. 1993;5:497–504
8. Maloney WJ, Jasty M, Burke DW, O’Connor DO, Zalenski EB, Bragdon C, et al. Biomechanical and histologic investigation of cemented total hip arthroplasties. A study of autopsy-retrieved femurs after in vivo cycling. Clinical Orthopaedics. 1989;249:129–140
9. Mann KA, Bartel DL, Wright TM, Ingraffea AR. Mechanical characteristics of the stem-cement interface. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. 1991;9:798–808
10. Mann K, Bartel D, Wright T, Burstein A. Coulomb frictional interfaces in modeling cemented total hip replacements (a more realistic model). Journal of Biomechanics. 1995;28:1067–1078
    • Abstract
    • Full-Text PDF (3192 KB)
    • CrossRef
11. Mann KA, Werner FW, Ayers DC. Modeling the tensile behavior of the cement-bone interface using nonlinear fracture mechanics. Journal of Biomedical Engineering. 1997;119:175–178
12. Mottershead, J.E., 1993. Finite element analysis of contact and friction—a survey. In: (Ed.), NAFEMS Report. NAFEMS, Glasgow, UK.
13. Mottershead JE, Edwards PD, Whelan MP, English RG. Finite element analysis of a total knee replacement by using gauss point contact constraints. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part H—Journal of Engineering in Medicine. 1996;210:51–63
14. Rakotomanana R, Leyvraz P, Curnier A, Heegaard J, PJ R. A finite element model for evaluation of tibial prosthesis-bone interface in total knee replacement. Journal of Biomechanics. 1992;25:1413–1424
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
15. Ramaniraka, N.A., Leyvraz, P.F., Rakotomana, L.R., P. J, R., Zysset, P.K., 1996. Micromotion at the bone-implant interface during the gait cycle after cementless total hip replacement: influence of stem design and loading level. Hip International 6, 51–58.
16. Rohlmann A, Cheal EJ, Hayes WC, Bergmann G. A nonlinear finite element analysis of interface conditions in porous coated hip endoprostheses. Journal of Biomechanics. 1988;21:605–611
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
17. Rubin PJ, Rakotomanana RL, Leyvraz PF, Zysset PK, Curnier A, Heegaard JH. Frictional interface micromotions and anisotropic stress-distribution in a femoral total hip component. Journal of Biomechanics. 1993;26:725–739
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
18. Sathasivam S, Walker PS. The conflicting requirements of laxity and conformity in total knee replacement. Journal of Biomechanics. 1999;32:239–247
    • Abstract
    • Full Text
    • Full-Text PDF (1862 KB)
    • CrossRef
19. Sharma M, Langrana NA, Rodriguez J. Modeling of facet articulation as a nonlinear moving contact problem (sensitivity study on lumbar facet response). Journal of Biomechanical Engineering. 1998;120:118–125
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
20. Skinner HB, Kim AS, Keyak JH, Mote CDJ. Femoral prosthesis implantation induces changes in bone stress that depend on the extent of porous coating. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. 1994;12:553–563
21. Sugiyama, H., Whiteside, L.A., Kaiser, A.D., 1989. Examination of rotational fixation of the femoral component in total hip arthroplasty. A mechanical study of micromovement and acoustic emission. Clinical Orthopaedics 122–128.
22. Tissakht M, Eskandari H, Ahmed AM. Micromotion analysis of the fixation of total knee tibial component. Computers and Structures. 1995;56:365–375
23. Verdonschot N, Huiskes R, Freeman MAR. Pre-clinical testing of hip prosthetic designs (a comparison of finite element calculations and laboratory tests). Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part H—Journal of Engineering in Medicine. 1993;207:149–154
24. Viceconti M, Muccini R, Bernakiewicz M, Baleani M, Cristofolini L. Large-sliding contact elements accurately predict levels of bone- implant micromotion relevant to osseointegration. Journal of Biomechanics. 2000;33:1611–1618
    • Abstract
    • Full Text
    • Full-Text PDF (333 KB)
    • CrossRef
25. Weinans H, Huiskes R, Grootenboer HJ. Trends of mechanical consequences and modeling of a fibrous membrane around femoral hip prostheses. Journal of Biomechanics. 1990;23:991–1000
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
26. Wheeler JP, Miles AW, Clift SE. The influence of the stem-cement interface in total hip replacement—a comparison of experimental and finite element approaches. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers [H]. 1997;211(2):181–186
27. Zienkiewicz OC, Taylor RJ. Finite Element Method. London: McGraw-Hill; 1989;