Journal of Biomechanics
Volume 35, Issue 9 , Pages 1213-1223, September 2002

Assessment of the aortic stress–strain relation in uniaxial tension

  • Dimitrios P. Sokolis

      Affiliations

    • Laboratory for Experimental Surgery and Surgical Research, School of Medicine, University of Athens, Athens 11527, Greece
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. 10 Evripidou Street, 15237 Filothei, Athens, Greece. Tel.: +30-1-6815544
  • ,
  • Harisios Boudoulas

      Affiliations

    • The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
  • ,
  • Panayotis E. Karayannacos

      Affiliations

    • Laboratory for Experimental Surgery and Surgical Research, School of Medicine, University of Athens, Athens 11527, Greece

Accepted 16 April 2002.

Abstract 

The passive elastic characteristics of the abdominal aorta were investigated in two experimental animal models, aiming at assessing the stress–strain relation of the aortic wall. Twenty porcine and 15 rabbit healthy abdominal aortas were subjected to uniaxial stress–strain analysis, performed on a tensile-testing device, while immersed in a physiologic saline bath at body temperature. Measured parameters included original length, width and thickness, as well as axial force and extension. Based on these data, Kirchhoff stress and Green–St.Venant strain were computed and one-dimensional constitutive equations were defined, comprising of a power function and two exponential ones, in turn, for the low, physiologic and high-stress regions. The stress–strain curves were plotted as elastic modulus versus stress, displaying nonlinear part I and linear parts II and III. These were regressed, yielding parameters k, q (part I), a, b (part II) and c, d (part III). A detailed comparison of these constitutive parameters was undertaken between the two species, demonstrating variations in d (p<0.05). No statistical differences were found in parameters a, b, c, k and q, implying that the two aortas were equally stiff under low and physiologic stresses, whereas the porcine aorta was stiffer at higher stresses. In conclusion, a bi-exponential in addition to a power law was established, relating stress and strain in the aorta, which is advantageous in comparison with previous constitutive equations. Under passive conditions, the nonlinear nature of this constitutive law may account for the low, part I, physiologic, part II, and high-stress, part III of the stress–strain relationship, supporting the concept of the aortic wall as a biphasic material.

Keywords:  Aorta, Elasticity, Stress–strain analysis

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0021-9290(02)00073-8

Journal of Biomechanics
Volume 35, Issue 9 , Pages 1213-1223, September 2002