A mechano-regulation model for tissue differentiation during fracture healing: analysis of gap size and loading

References 

1. Anderson, C.B., 1967. Mechanics of fluids. In: Baumeister, T. (Ed.), Marks’ Saturated Handbook of Mechanical Engineers, pp. 3.48–3.76.
2. Aranzulla PJ, Muckle DS, Cunningham JL. A portable monitoring system for measuring weight-bearing during tibial fracture healing. Medical Engineering and Physics. 1998;20:543–548
3. Armstrong CG, Mow VC. Variations in the intrinsic mechanical properties of human articular cartilage with age, degeneration and water content. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 1982;64A:88–94
4. Augat P, Margevicius K, Simon J, Wolf S, Suger G, Claes L. Local tissue properties in bone healing (influence of size and stability of the osteotomy gap). Journal of Orthopaedic Research. 1998;16:475–481
5. Bailón-Plaza A, van der Meulen MCH. A mathematical framework to study the effects of growth factor influences on fracture healing. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 2001;212:191–209
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
6. Blenman PR, Carter DR, Beaupré GS. Role of mechanical loading in the progressive ossification of a fracture callus. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. 1989;7:398–407
7. Brand RA, Rubin CT. Fracture healing. In: Surgery of the Musculoskeletal System. 1990;1:93–114
8. Brown, T.D., 2001. Devices and techniques for in vitro mechanical stimulation of bone cells. In: Cowin, S.C. (Ed.), Bone Mechanics Handbook (Chapter 27).
9. Carter DR, Blenman PR, Beaupré GS. Correlations between mechanical stress history and tissue differentiation in initial fracture healing. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. 1988;6:736–748
10. Carter DR, Beaupré GS, Giori NJ, Helms JA. Mechanobiology of skeletal regeneration. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 1998;355S:S41–S55
    • CrossRef
11. Carter, D.R., Helms, J.A., Tay, B.K., Beaupré, G.A., 1998b. Stress and strain distributions predict tissue differentiation patterns in distraction osteogenesis. Trans of the 44th O.R.S., p. 234.
12. Claes LE, Heigele CA. Magnitudes of local stress and strain along bony surfaces predict the course and type of fracture healing. Journal of Biomechanics. 1999;32:255–266
    • Abstract
    • Full Text
    • Full-Text PDF (1269 KB)
    • CrossRef
13. Claes LE, Heigele CA, Neidlinger-Wilke C, Kaspar D, Seidl W, Margevicius KJ, et al. Effects of mechanical factors on the fracture healing process. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 1998;355S:S132–S147
    • CrossRef
14. Cowin SC. Bone poroelasticity. Journal of Biomechanics. 1999;32:217–238
    • Abstract
    • Full Text
    • Full-Text PDF (386 KB)
    • CrossRef
15. Duda GN, Eckert-Hübner K, Sokiranski R, Kreutner A, Miller R, Claes L. Analysis of interfragmentary movement as a function of musculoskeletal loading conditions in sheep. Journal of Biomechanics. 1998;31:201–210
    • Abstract
    • Full Text
    • Full-Text PDF (282 KB)
    • CrossRef
16. Einhorn TA. The cell and molecular biology of fracture healing. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 1998;355S:7–21
17. Frost HM. The biology of fracture healing—an overview for clinicians. Part I. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 1989;248:283–293
18. Gardner TA, Stoll T, Marks L, Knothe Tate M. The influence of mechanical stimulus on the pattern of tissue differentiation in a long bone fracture—an FEM study. Journal of Biomechanics. 2000;33:415–425
    • Abstract
    • Full Text
    • Full-Text PDF (1052 KB)
    • CrossRef
19. Goodship AE, Kenwright J. The influence of induced micromovement upon the healing of experimental tibial fractures. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 1985;67B:650–655
20. Hori RY, Lewis JL. Mechanical properties of the fibrous tissue found at the bone cement interface following total joint replacement. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. 1982;16:911–927
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
21. Huiskes R, van Driel WD, Prendergast PJ, Søballe K. A biomechanical regulatory model of peri-prosthetic tissue differentiation. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine. 1997;8:785–788
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
22. Kenwright J, Gardner T. Mechanical influences on tibial fracture healing. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 1998;355S:179–190
23. Kuiper, J.H., Ashton, B.A., Richardson, J.B., 2000. Computer simulation of fracture callus formation and stiffness restoration. In: Prendergast, P.J., Lee, T.C., Carr, A.J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the European Society of Biomechanics, Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland, Dublin, p. 61 (www.biomechanics.ie/esb2000).
24. Lacroix, D., 2001. Simulation of tissue differentiation during fracture healing. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Dublin. www.mme.tcd.ie/Groups/Bioengineering/Fracture-Healing/DLacroix/
25. Lacroix, D., Prendergast, P.J., 2000. A 3D finite element model of a tibia to simulate the regenerative and resorption phases of fracture healing. In: Prendergast, P.J., Lee, T.C., Carr, A.J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the European Society of Biomechanics, Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland, Dublin, p. 60 (www.biomechanics.ie/esb2000).
26. Lacroix D, Prendergast PJ, Li G, Marsh D. Biomechanical model to simulate tissue differentiation and bone regeneration (application to fracture healing). Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing. 2002;40:14–21
27. Loboa EG, Beaupré GS, Carter DR. Mechanobiology of initial pseudoarthrosis formation with oblique fractures. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. 2001;19:1067–1072
28. McKibbin B. The biology of fracture healing in long bones. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 1978;60B:150–162
29. Murray JD. Mathematical Biology. Berlin: Springer; 1989;
30. Ochoa, J.A., Hillberry, B.M., 1992. Permeability of bovine cancellous bone. Trans. of the 38th ORS, p. 162.
31. Pauwels, F., 1960. Eine neue theorie über den einfluß mechanischer reize auf die differenzierung der stützgewebe. Z Anat Entwickl. Gesch. 121, 478–515. Translated as A new theory concerning the influence of mechanical stimuli on the differentiation of the supporting tissues. In: Maquet, P., Furlong, R. (Eds.), Biomechanics of the Locomotor Apparatus, Springer, Berlin, 1980, pp. 375–407.
32. Perren SM. Physical and biological aspects of fracture healing with special reference to internal fixation. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 1979;138:175–196
33. Prendergast PJ, Huiskes R, Søballe K. Biophysical stimuli on cells during tissue differentiation at implant interfaces. Journal of Biomechanics. 1997;30:539–548
    • Abstract
    • Full-Text PDF (1240 KB)
    • CrossRef
34. Prendergast PJ, van Driel WD, Kuiper JH. A comparison of finite element codes for the solution of biphasic poroelastic problems. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers: Journal of Engineering in Medicine. 1996;210:131–136
35. Schaffler MB, Burr DB. Stiffness of compact bone (effects of porosity and density). Journal of Biomechanics. 1988;21:13–16
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
36. Schlegel, U., Eckhardt, Ch., Bouxsein, M.L., Seeherman, H.J., Schneider, E., 2000. In vivo monitoring of fracture healing. In: Prendergast, P.J., Lee, T.C., Carr, A.J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the European Society of Biomechanics, Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland, Dublin, p. 58 (www.biomechanics.ie/esb2000.).
37. Tepic S, Macirowski T, Mann RW. Mechanical properties of articular cartilage elucidated by osmotic loading and ultrasound. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 1983;80:3331–3333