In vivo debonding strength and enamel damage in two orthodontic debonding methods

References 

1. Al-Munajed MK, Gordon PH, McCabe JF. The use of a cyanoacrylate adhesive for bonding orthodontic brackets (an ex vivo study). Journal of Orthodontics. 2000;27:255–260
   • MEDLINE
2. Arici S, Minors C. The force levels required to mechanically debond ceramic brackets (an in vitro comparative study). European Journal of Orthodontics. 2000;22:327–334
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
3. Bishara SE, Fehr DE, Jakobsen JR. A comparative study of the debonding strengths of different ceramic brackets, enamel conditioners, and adhesives. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1993;104:170–179
4. Bishara SE, Fonseca JM, Boyer DB. The use of debonding pliers in the removal of ceramic brackets (force levels and enamel cracks). American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1995;108:242–248
5. Bishara SE, Olsen ME, Damon P, Jakobsen JR. Evaluation of a new light-cured orthodontic bonding adhesive. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1998;114:80–87
6. Bishara SE, VonWald L, Laffoon JF, Warren JJ. Effect of using a new cyanoacrylate adhesive on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthodontics. 2001;71:466–469
7. Douglas R, Foley TF, Mamandras A. Comparison of bond strength of three adhesives (composite resin, hybrid GIC, and glass-filled GIC). American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2001;119:36–42
8. Eliades T, Brantley WA. The inappropriateness of conventional orthodontic bond strength assessment protocols. European Journal of Orthodontics. 2000;22:13–23
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
9. Garcia-Godoy F, Hubbard GW, Storey AT. Effect of a fluoridated etching gel on enamel morphology and shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1991;100:163–170
10. Graf I, Jacobi BE. Bond strength of various fluoride–releasing orthodontic bonding systems. Experimental study. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics. 2000;61:191–198
11. Hobson RS, McCabe JF. Relationship between enamel etch characteristics and resin-enamel bond strength. British Dental Journal. 2002;27(192):463–468
12. Joseph VP, Rossouw PE. The shear bond strengths of stainless steel orthodontic brackets bonded to teeth with orthodontic composite resin and various fissure sealants. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1990;98:66–71
13. Kapur R, Sinha PK, Nanda RS. Comparison of load transmission and bracket deformation between titanium and stainless steel brackets. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1999;116:275–278
14. Karamouzos A, Mavropoulos A, Athanasiou AE, Kolokithas G. In vivo evaluation of a moisture-activated orthodontic adhesive (a comparative clinical trial). Orthodontics Craniofacial Research. 2002;5:170–178
15. Katona TR. The effects of load location and misalignment on shear/peel testing of direct bonded orthodontic brackets—a finite element model. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1994;106:395–402
16. Katona TR. A comparison of the stresses developed in tension, shear peel, and torsion strength testing of direct bonded orthodontic brackets. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1997;112:244–251
17. Katona TR. Stresses developed during clinical debonding of stainless steel orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthodontics. 1997;67:39–46
18. Knoll M, Gwinnett AJ, Wolff MS. Shear bond strengths of brackets bonded to anterior and posterior teeth. American Journal of Orthodontics. 1986;89:476–479
    • Abstract
    • Full-Text PDF (287 KB)
    • CrossRef
19. Knox J, Jones ML, Hubsch P, Middleton J, Kralj B. An evaluation of the stresses generated in bonded orthodontic attachment by three different load cases using the finite element method of stress analysis. Journal of Orthodontics. 2000;27:39–46
    • MEDLINE
20. Larmour CJ, Stirrups DR. An ex vivo assessment of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement in relation to bonding technique. Journal of Orthodontics. 2001;28:207–210
    • MEDLINE
21. McCourt JW, Cooley RL, Barnwell S. Bond strength of light-cure fluoride-releasing base-liners as orthodontic bracket adhesives. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1991;100:47–52
22. Osorio R, Toledano M, Garcia-Godoy F. Enamel surface morphology after bracket debonding. ASDC Journal of Dentistry for Children. 1998;65:313–317
23. Osorio R, Toledano M, Garcia-Godoy F. Bracket bonding with 15- or 60-second etching and adhesive remaining on enamel after debonding. Angle Orthodontist. 1999;69:45–48
24. Rix D, Foley TF, Mamandras A. Comparison of bond strength of three adhesives (composite resin, hybrid GIC, and glass-filled GIC). American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2001;119:36–42
25. Shammaa I, Ngan P, Kim H, Kao E, Gladwin M, Gunel E, et al. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement (an in vitro and in vivo study). Angle Orthodontist. 1999;69:463–469
26. Sinha PK, Nanda RS, Duncanson MG, Michael J, Hosier BS. Bond strengths and remnant adhesive resin on debonding for orthodontic bonding techniques. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1995;108:302–307
27. Sorel O, El Alam R, Chagneau F, Cathelineau G. Comparison of bond strength between simple foil mesh and laser-structured base retention brackets. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2002;122:260–266
28. Wang WN, Meng CL, Tarng TH. Bond strength (a comparison between chemical coated and mechanical interlock bases of ceramic and metal brackets). American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofaccial Orthopedics. 1997;111:374–381
29. Zarrinnia K, Eid NM, Kehoe MJ. The effect of different debonding techniques on the enamel surface (an in vitro qualitative study). American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofaccial Orthopedics. 1995;108:284–293