Journal of Biomechanics
Volume 38, Issue 9 , Pages 1838-1845, September 2005

Cellular accommodation and the response of bone to mechanical loading

  • Jennifer L. Schriefer

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue School of Engineering and Technology, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA
  • ,
  • Stuart J. Warden

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
  • ,
  • Leanne K. Saxon

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
  • ,
  • Alexander G. Robling

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
  • ,
  • Charles H. Turner

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
    • Biomechanics and Biomaterials Research Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Indiana University, 1120 South Dr., FH 115, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA. Tel: +1-317-274-3226; fax: +1-317-278-9568.

Accepted 17 August 2004. published online 19 November 2004.

Abstract 

Several mathematical rules by which bone adapts to mechanical loading have been proposed. Previous work focused mainly on negative feedback models, e.g., bone adapts to increased loading after a minimum strain effective (MES) threshold has been reached. The MES algorithm has numerous caveats, so we propose a different model, according to which bone adapts to changes in its mechanical environment based on the principle of cellular accommodation. With the new algorithm we presume that strain history is integrated into cellular memory so that the reference state for adaptation is constantly changing. To test this algorithm, an experiment was performed in which the ulnae of Sprague–Dawley rats were loaded in axial compression. The animals received loading for 15 weeks with progressively decreasing loads, increasing loads, or a constant load. The results showed the largest increases in geometry in the decreasing load group, followed by the constant load group. Bone formation rates (BFRs) were significantly greater in the decreasing load group during the first 2 weeks of the study as compared to all other groups (). After the first few weeks of mechanical loading, the BFR in the loaded ulnae returned to the values of the nonloaded ulnae. These experimental results closely fit the predicted results of the cellular accommodation algorithm. After the initial weeks of loading, bone stopped responding so the degree of adaptation was proportional to the initial peak load magnitude.

Keywords: Bone density, Biomechanics, Mechanical loading, Osteoporosis

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0021-9290(04)00412-9

doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.08.017

Journal of Biomechanics
Volume 38, Issue 9 , Pages 1838-1845, September 2005