Journal of Biomechanics
Volume 39, Issue 8 , Pages 1444-1453, 2006

Can initial and additional compensatory steps be predicted in young, older, and balance-impaired older females in response to anterior and posterior waist pulls while standing?

  • Brian W. Schulz

      Affiliations

    • Biomechanics Research Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
    • Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Mobility Research Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
    • Institute of Gerontology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Patient Safety Research Center, James A. Haley VA Hospital, Tampa, FL 33612, USA. Tel.: +18135583944; fax: +18135583990.
  • ,
  • James A. Ashton-Miller

      Affiliations

    • Biomechanics Research Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
    • Institute of Gerontology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
  • ,
  • Neil B. Alexander

      Affiliations

    • Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Mobility Research Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
    • Institute of Gerontology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
    • VA Ann Arbor Health Care System, Geriatrics Research Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), MI, USA

Accepted 8 April 2005. published online 14 June 2005.

Abstract 

The initiation of a single compensatory step in response to balance perturbations has been predicted with accuracies of up to 71%. We sought to determine whether similar methods also could be used to predict the onset of additional compensatory steps in both healthy and balance-impaired older females. Anterior and posterior waist pulls of five different magnitudes were applied to 13 unimpaired young (mean age 23 years), 12 unimpaired older (mean age 71 years), and 15 balance-impaired older (mean age 76 years) women. Body segment kinematic data were recorded at 100Hz. A step was predicted when the time for the center-of-mass to reach the vertical projection of the boundary of the base-of-support fell below a certain threshold. The results show that 83% of all steps and non-steps were correctly predicted at an optimal time-to-boundary threshold () of 0.78s. Step prediction accuracy did not differ significantly by group: 86% of steps and non-steps by young, 84% by unimpaired old, and 82% by balance-impaired old women were correctly predicted at of 0.58, 0.67, and 0.78s, respectively. Anterior steps and non-steps were predicted more accurately than posterior ones (94% vs. 79% correct at of 0.52 and 0.84s, respectively) and initial steps were better predicted than additional ones (87% vs. 81% correct at of 0.77 and 0.34s, respectively). We conclude that this step prediction method reasonably predicts initial and additional steps in the anterior and posterior direction by all three subject cohorts.

Keywords: Stepping, Perturbation, Falls, Postural control, Aging

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0021-9290(05)00177-6

doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.04.004

Journal of Biomechanics
Volume 39, Issue 8 , Pages 1444-1453, 2006