Journal of Biomechanics
Volume 39, Issue 13 , Pages 2438-2444, 2006

Handling of impact forces in inverse dynamics

  • Rob W. Bisseling

      Affiliations

    • Center for Human Movement Sciences, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 196, 9700 AD Groningen, The Netherlands
    • University Center for Sport, Movement and Health, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Center for Human Movement Sciences, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 196, 9700 AD Groningen, The Netherlands. Tel.:+31503632710; fax: +31503633150.
  • ,
  • At L. Hof

      Affiliations

    • University Center for Sport, Movement and Health, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands

Accepted 27 July 2005. published online 04 October 2005.

Abstract 

In the standard inverse dynamic method, joint moments are assessed from ground reaction force data and position data, where segmental accelerations are calculated by numerical differentiation of position data after low-pass filtering. This method falls short in analyzing the impact phase, e.g. landing after a jump, by underestimating the contribution of the segmental accelerations to the joint moment assessment. This study tried to improve the inverse dynamics method for the assessment of knee moment by evaluating different cutoff frequencies in low-pass filtering of position data on the calculation of knee moment. Next to this, the effect of an inclusion of direct measurement of segmental acceleration using accelerometers to the inverse dynamics was evaluated. Evidence was obtained that during impact, the contribution of the ground reaction force to the sagittal knee moment was neutralized by the moments generated by very high segmental accelerations. Because the accelerometer-based method did not result in the expected improvement of the knee moment assessment during activities with high impacts, it is proposed to filter the ground reaction force with the same cutoff frequency as the calculated accelerations. When this precaution is not taken, the impact peaks in the moments can be considered as artifacts. On the basis of these findings, we recommend in the search to biomechanical explanations of chronic overuse injuries, like jumper's knee, not to consider the relation with impact peak force and impact peak moment.

Keywords: Accelerometers, Biomechanics, Impact, Inverse dynamics, Jumping, Overuse injuries

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0021-9290(05)00360-X

doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.07.021

Journal of Biomechanics
Volume 39, Issue 13 , Pages 2438-2444, 2006