Journal Home
Search for

Volume 39, Issue 13, Pages 2363-2370 (2006)


View previous. 4 of 25 View next.

Reduction of plantar heel pressures: Insole design using finite element analysis

Steven Goskea, Ahmet Erdemirb, Marc Petrebc, Sachin Budhabhattibd, Peter R. CavanaghbeCorresponding Author Informationemail address

Accepted 15 August 2005. published online 04 October 2005.

Abstract 

Plantar heel pain is a common condition that is often exacerbated by the repetitive stresses of walking. Treatment usually includes an in-shoe intervention designed to reduce plantar pressure under the heel by using insoles and a variety of off-the-shelf products. The design process for these products is often intuitive in nature and does not always rely on scientifically derived guidelines. Finite element analysis provides an efficient computational framework to investigate the performance of a large number of designs for optimal plantar pressure reduction. In this study, we used two-dimensional plane strain finite element modeling to investigate 27 insole designs. Combinations of three insole conformity levels (flat, half conforming, full conforming), three insole thickness values (6.3, 9.5 and 12.7mm) and three insole materials (Poron Cushioning, Microcel Puff Lite and Microcel Puff) were simulated during the early support phase of gait. Plantar pressures predicted by the model were validated by experimental trials conducted in the same subject whose heel was modeled by loading the bare foot on a rigid surface and on foam mats. Conformity of the insole was the most important design variable, whereas peak pressures were relatively insensitive to insole material selection. The model predicted a 24% relief in pressure compared to barefoot conditions when using flat insoles; the reduction increased up to 44% for full conforming insoles.

a Department of Biomedical Engineering, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO 63103, USA

b Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA

c Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA

d Department of Chemical & Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, OH 44115, USA

e Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Orthopaedic Research Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Biomedical Engineering/ND 20, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA. Tel.: +12164456980; fax: +12164449198.

PII: S0021-9290(05)00375-1

doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.08.006


View previous. 4 of 25 View next.