Journal of Biomechanics
Volume 40, Issue 1 , Pages 20-25, 2007

Why fine-wire fixators work: An analysis of pressure distribution at the wire–bone interface

  • T.N. Board

      Affiliations

    • Manchester University, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +441706825969; fax: +441706824113.
  • ,
  • L. Yang

      Affiliations

    • Division of Clinical Sciences (North), University of Sheffield, Coleridge House, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield S5 7AU, UK
  • ,
  • M. Saleh

      Affiliations

    • Division of Clinical Sciences (North), University of Sheffield, Coleridge House, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield S5 7AU, UK

Accepted 2 December 2005. published online 03 February 2006.

Abstract 

Tensioned fine-wire external fixator systems have been used successfully for the treatment of fractures, mal-unions and for limb lengthening for many years. When used in metaphyseal bone, this type of fixator has a lower loosening rate than half-pin fixators. The differing mechanical properties of these fixator systems have been investigated extensively; however, most studies have centered on the mechanical properties of the fixator as a whole. Our knowledge of the interactions occurring at the interface between implant and bone remains sparse. In order to investigate this interaction, we devised a simple experimental model to characterise the distribution of pressure in cancellous bone surrounding a tensioned wire under loading conditions. Comparison was then made to a similar model of a half-pin fixator. Pressure was measured using pressure sensitive film at various distances away from the implant–bone interface. Static, single cycle loading of the model was performed with a Universal Testing Machine. Pressure distribution in the fine-wire model was found to occur in three regions: polar, beam loading and uniform. Polar patterns were seen closest to the wire with pressure concentrated at the entry and exit points of the wire. Beam loading was seen at a distance of 1.5mm from the wire and pressure reached a uniform distribution at 4.0mm. Most of the pressure measured was less than 2MPa, which is less than the yield strength of cancellous bone (2–7MPa). Higher loads produced higher stresses but the distribution pattern was similar. In contrast, the half-pin model showed far higher pressures (20MPa), which were present deeper in the bone specimen. These results further our understanding of the biomechanics of fine-wire fixators and may explain the lower loosening rate of this type of fixator when compared to half-pin fixators used in metaphyseal bone.

Keywords: Fine-wire, Interface, Pressure distribution, Ilizarov

 

PII: S0021-9290(05)00538-5

doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.12.005

Journal of Biomechanics
Volume 40, Issue 1 , Pages 20-25, 2007