Why fine-wire fixators work: An analysis of pressure distribution at the wire–bone interface
Abstract
Tensioned fine-wire external fixator systems have been used successfully for the treatment of fractures, mal-unions and for limb lengthening for many years. When used in metaphyseal bone, this type of fixator has a lower loosening rate than half-pin fixators. The differing mechanical properties of these fixator systems have been investigated extensively; however, most studies have centered on the mechanical properties of the fixator as a whole. Our knowledge of the interactions occurring at the interface between implant and bone remains sparse. In order to investigate this interaction, we devised a simple experimental model to characterise the distribution of pressure in cancellous bone surrounding a tensioned wire under loading conditions. Comparison was then made to a similar model of a half-pin fixator. Pressure was measured using pressure sensitive film at various distances away from the implant–bone interface. Static, single cycle loading of the model was performed with a Universal Testing Machine. Pressure distribution in the fine-wire model was found to occur in three regions: polar, beam loading and uniform. Polar patterns were seen closest to the wire with pressure concentrated at the entry and exit points of the wire. Beam loading was seen at a distance of 1.5
mm from the wire and pressure reached a uniform distribution at 4.0
mm. Most of the pressure measured was less than 2
MPa, which is less than the yield strength of cancellous bone (2–7
MPa). Higher loads produced higher stresses but the distribution pattern was similar. In contrast, the half-pin model showed far higher pressures (20
MPa), which were present deeper in the bone specimen. These results further our understanding of the biomechanics of fine-wire fixators and may explain the lower loosening rate of this type of fixator when compared to half-pin fixators used in metaphyseal bone.
Keywords: Fine-wire, Interface, Pressure distribution, Ilizarov
PII: S0021-9290(05)00538-5
doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.12.005
© 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
