Journal of Biomechanics
Volume 40, Issue 16 , Pages 3570-3579 , 2007

Inter-joint coupling effects on muscle contributions to endpoint force and acceleration in a musculoskeletal model of the cat hindlimb

  • Keith W. van Antwerp

      Affiliations

    • The Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering at Georgia Tech and Emory University, 313 Ferst Drive, Atlanta, GA 30322-0535, USA
  • ,
  • Thomas J. Burkholder

      Affiliations

    • School of Applied Physiology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
  • ,
  • Lena H. Ting

      Affiliations

    • The Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering at Georgia Tech and Emory University, 313 Ferst Drive, Atlanta, GA 30322-0535, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +14048945216.

,Accepted 4 June 2007.

References 

  1. Abelew, T.A., Huyghues-Despointes, C.M.J.I., Nichols, T.R., 1996. Three dimensional knee torques produced by the quadriceps and hamstrings muscles in the cat. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting for the Soc. of Neuroscience Abstr. 22. Washington, DC, pp. 2042.
  2. Anderson FC, Goldberg SR, Pandy MG, Delp SL. Contributions of muscle forces and toe-off kinematics to peak knee flexion during the swing phase of normal gait: an induced position analysis. Journal of Biomechanics. 2004;37(5):731–737
  3. Bernstein N. The Coordination and Regulation of Movements. New York: Pergamon Press; 1967;
  4. Biewener AA, Konieczynski DD, Baudinette RV. In vivo muscle force-length behavior during steady-speed hopping in tammar wallabies. Journal of Experimental Biology. 1998;201(Pt 11):1681–1694
  5. Bonasera SJ, Nichols TR. Mechanical actions of heterogenic reflexes among ankle stabilizers and their interactions with plantarflexors of the cat hindlimb. Journal of Neurophysiology. 1996;75(5):2050–2070
  6. Burkholder TJ, Nichols TR. The mechanical action of proprioceptive length feedback in a model of cat hindlimb. Motor Control. 2000;4(2):201–220
  7. Burkholder TJ, Nichols TR. Three-dimensional model of the feline hindlimb. Journal of Morphology. 2004;261(1):118–129
  8. Chen G. Induced acceleration contributions to locomotion dynamics are not physically well defined. Gait Posture. 2006;23(1):37–44
  9. d’Avella A, Saltiel P, Bizzi E. Combinations of muscle synergies in the construction of a natural motor behavior. Nature Neuroscience. 2003;6(3):300–308
  10. Daley MA, Biewener AA. Muscle force-length dynamics during level versus incline locomotion: a comparison of in vivo performance of two guinea fowl ankle extensors. Journal of Experimental Biology. 2003;206(Pt 17):2941–2958
  11. Drew T, Jiang W, Widajewicz W. Contributions of the motor cortex to the control of the hindlimbs during locomotion in the cat. Brain Research and Brain Research Reviews. 2002;40(1–3):178–191
  12. Engberg I, Lundberg A. An electromyographic analysis of muscular activity in the hindlimb of the cat during unrestrained locomotion. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica. 1969;75(4):614–630
  13. Fregly BJ, Zajac FE. A state-space analysis of mechanical energy generation, absorption, and transfer during pedaling. Journal of Biomechanics. 1996;29(1):81–90
  14. Fukunaga T, Kubo K, Kawakami Y, Fukashiro S, Kanehisa H, Maganaris CN. In vivo behaviour of human muscle tendon during walking. Proceedings in Biological Science. 2001;268(1464):229–233
  15. Full RJ, Koditschek DE. Templates and anchors: neuromechanical hypotheses of legged locomotion on land. Journal of Experimental Biology. 1999;202(Pt 23):3325–3332
  16. Henry SM, Fung J, Horak FB. EMG responses to maintain stance during multidirectional surface translations. Journal of Neurophysiology. 1998;80(4):1939–1950
  17. Ivanenko YP, Poppele RE, Lacquaniti E. Five basic muscle activation patterns account for muscle activity during human locomotion. Journal of Physiology—London. 2004;556(1):267–282
  18. Jankowska E, Krutki P, Matsuyama K. Relative contribution of Ia inhibitory interneurones to inhibition of feline contralateral motoneurones evoked via commissural interneurones. Journal of Physiology. 2005;568(Pt 2):617–628
  19. Kaya M, Leonard TR, Herzog W. Control of ground reaction forces by hindlimb muscles during cat locomotion. Journal of Biomechanics. 2005;
  20. Lawrence JH, Nichols TR, English AW. Cat hindlimb muscles exert substantial torques outside the sagittal plane. Journal of Neurophysiology. 1993;69(1):282–285
  21. Lichtwark GA, Bougoulias K, Wilson AM. Muscle fascicle and series elastic element length changes along the length of the human gastrocnemius during walking and running. Journal of Biomechanics. 2007;40(1):157–164
  22. Lombard WP. The action of two-joint muscles. American Physical Education Review. 1903;8:141–145
  23. Macpherson JM. Strategies that simplify the control of quadrupedal stance. I. Forces at the ground. Journal of Neurophysiology. 1988;60(1):204–217
  24. Macpherson JM. Strategies that simplify the control of quadrupedal stance. II. Electromyographic activity. Journal of Neurophysiology. 1988;60(1):218–231
  25. McCrea DA. Spinal circuitry of sensorimotor control of locomotion. Journal of Physiology—London. 2001;533(1):41–50
  26. McKay JL, Burkholder TJ, Ting LH. Biomechanical capabilities influence postural control strategies in the cat hindlimb. Journal of Biomechanics. 2006;
  27. Murinas, K., 2003. Transformation of muscular actions into endpoint forces in the cat hindlimb during stance. Masters Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.
  28. Raasch CC, Zajac FE. Locomotor strategy for pedaling: Muscle groups and biomechanical functions. Journal of Neurophysiology. 1999;82(2):515–525
  29. Raasch CC, Zajac FE, Ma B, Levine WS. Muscle coordination of maximum-speed pedaling. Journal of Biomechanics. 1997;30(6):595–602
  30. Riley PO, Della Croce U, Kerrigan DC. Propulsive adaptation to changing gait speed. Journal of Biomechanics. 2001;34(2):197–202
  31. Sciavicco L, Siciliano B. Modelling and Control of Robot Manipulators. Berlin: Springer; 2000;
  32. Siegel KL, Kepple TM, Caldwell GE. Improved agreement of foot segmental power and rate of energy change during gait: inclusion of distal power terms and use of three-dimensional models. Journal of Biomechanics. 1996;29(6):823–827
  33. Ting, L.H., in press. Dimensional reduction in sensorimotor systems: A framework for understanding muscle coordination of posture, In: Cisek, P., Drew, T., Kalaska, J.F. (Eds.). Progress in Brain Research. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
  34. Ting LH, Macpherson JM. A limited set of muscle synergies for force control during a postural task. Journal of Neurophysiology. 2005;93(1):609–613
  35. Torres-Oviedo G, Macpherson JM, Ting LH. Muscle synergy organization is robust across a variety of postural perturbations. Journal of Neurophysiology. 2006;96:1530–1546
  36. Tresch MC, Saltiel P, Bizzi E. The construction of movement by the spinal cord. Nature Neuroscience. 1999;2(2):162–167
  37. Valero-Cuevas FJ, Zajac FE, Burgar CG. Large index-fingertip forces are produced by subject-independent patterns of muscle excitation. Journal of Biomechanics. 1998;31(8):693–703
  38. Wilmink RJ, Nichols TR. Distribution of heterogenic reflexes among the quadriceps and triceps surae muscles of the cat hind limb. Journal of Neurophysiology. 2003;90(4):2310–2324
  39. Zajac FE. Muscle coordination of movement: a perspective. Journal of Biomechanics. 1993;26(Suppl 1):109–124
  40. Zajac FE. Understanding muscle coordination of the human leg with dynamical simulations. Journal of Biomechanics. 2002;35(8):1011–1018
  41. Zajac FE, Gordon ME. Determining muscle's force and action in multi-articular movement. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews. 1989;17:187–230
  42. Zajac FE, Neptune RR, Kautz SA. Biomechanics and muscle coordination of human walking: Part II: lessons from dynamical simulations and clinical implications. Gait Posture. 2003;17(1):1–17
  43. Zatsiorsky VM. Kinetics of Human Motion. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2002;

PII: S0021-9290(07)00262-X

doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.06.001

Journal of Biomechanics
Volume 40, Issue 16 , Pages 3570-3579 , 2007