Journal of Biomechanics
Volume 41, Issue 1 , Pages 69-77 , 2008

Frictional contact mechanics methods for soft materials: Application to tracking breast cancers

  • Jae-Hoon Chung

      Affiliations

    • Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.
  • ,
  • Vijay Rajagopal

      Affiliations

    • Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
  • ,
  • Tod A. Laursen

      Affiliations

    • Civil and Environmental Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
  • ,
  • Poul M.F. Nielsen

      Affiliations

    • Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
  • ,
  • Martyn P. Nash

      Affiliations

    • Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

,Accepted 20 July 2007.

References 

  1. Azar F, Metaxas D, Schnall M. Methods for modeling and predicting mechanical deformations of the breast under external perturbations. Medical Image Analysis. 2002;6(1):1–27
  2. Bonet J, Wood RD. Nonlinear Continuum Mechanics for Finite Element Analysis. Cambridge, USA: Cambridge University Press; 1997;
  3. Chung, J.H., Rajagopal, V., Nielsen, P.M., Nash, M.P., 2007. A biomechanical model of mammographic compressions. Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology, in press, doi:10.1007/s10237-006-0074-6.
  4. Dronkers DJ, Hendriks JH, Holland R, Rosenbusch G. The Practice of Mammography. Stuttgart, New York: Thieme; 2002;
  5. Fernandez JW, Hunter PJ. An anatomically based patient-specific finite element model of patella articulation: towards a diagnostic tool. Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology. 2005;4(1):20–38
  6. Fernandez J, Mithraratne P, Thrupp S, Tawhai M, Hunter P. Anatomically based geometric modelling of the musculo-skeletal system and other organs. Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology. 2004;2(3):139–155
  7. Laursen TA. Computational Contact and Impact Mechanics. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2002;
  8. Mattiasson K, Bernspang L, Samuelsson A. Solution of quasi-static, force-driven problems by means of a dynamic-explicit approach and an adaptive loading procedure. Engineering Computations. 1996;13(2–4):172–189
  9. Nielsen PM, LeGrice I, Smaill B, Hunter P. Mathematical model of geometry and fibrous structure of the heart. American Journal of Physiology. 1991;260(4):H1365–H1378
  10. Puso MA, Laursen TA. A mortar segment-to-segment contact method for large deformation solid mechanics. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. 2004;193(6–8):601–629
  11. Puso MA, Laursen TA. A mortar segment-to-segment frictional contact method for large deformations. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. 2004;193(45–47):4891–4913
  12. Qiu Y, Goldgof DB, Li L, Sarkar S, Zhang Y, Anton S. Correspondence recovery in 2-view mammography. In: IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro. 2004;p. 197–200
  13. Qui, Y., 2003. Three dimensional finite element model for lesion correspondence in breast imaging. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Florida.
  14. Rajagopal, V., 2007. Modelling breast tissue mechanics under gravity loading Ph.D. Thesis, University of Auckland.
  15. Ruiter, N.V., 2003. Registration of X-ray mammograms and MR-volumes of the female breast based on simulated mammographic deformation Ph.D. Thesis, der Universitat Mannheim.
  16. Tawhai M, Pullan A, Hunter P. Generation of an anatomically based three-dimensional model of the conducting airway. Annals of Biomedical Engineering. 2000;28:793–802
  17. Wirth, M., 1999. A nonrigid approach to medical image registration: matching images of the breast Ph.D. Thesis, RMIT University.

PII: S0021-9290(07)00334-X

doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.07.016

Journal of Biomechanics
Volume 41, Issue 1 , Pages 69-77 , 2008