Journal of Biomechanics
Volume 41, Issue 9 , Pages 1961-1968 , 2008

Some basic relationships between density values in cancellous and cortical bone

  • Peter Zioupos

      Affiliations

    • Biomechanics Laboratories, Department of Materials & Applied Science, Cranfield University, Shrivenham, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +441793785932; fax: +441793783076.
  • ,
  • Richard B. Cook

      Affiliations

    • Department of Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, Otago University, Dunedin, New Zealand
  • ,
  • John R. Hutchinson

      Affiliations

    • Structure and Motion Laboratory, The Royal Veterinary College, University of London, Hatfield, UK

,Accepted 28 March 2008.

References 

  1. Ashman RB, Rho J-Y. Elastic modulus of trabecular bone material. Journal of Biomechanics. 1988;21:177–181
  2. Aspden RM, Li B. Reproducibility using Archimedes’ principle in measuring cancellous bone volume by L. Zou, R.D. Bloebaum and K.N. Bachus. Medical Engineering and Physics. 1998;20:159–160
  3. Bonucci E. Mechanical testing of the bone and the bone–implant interface. In:  An YH,  Draughn RA editor. Basic Composition and Structure of Bone. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2000;p. 3–22
  4. Carter DR, Hayes WC. The compressive behaviour of bone as a two phase porous structure. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 1977;59-A:954–962
  5. Coats AM, Zioupos P, Aspden RM. Material properties of subchondral bone from patients with osteoporosis or osteoarthritis by microindentation testing and electron probe microanalysis. Calcified Tissue International. 2003;73:66–71
  6. Cook, R.B., 2005. Non-invasively assessed skeletal bone status and its relationship to the biomechanical properties and condition of cancellous bone. PhD Thesis, Cranfield University, UK.
  7. Galante J, Rostoker W, Ray RD. Physical properties of trabecular bone. Calcified Tissue Research. 1970;5:236–246
  8. Gibson LJ. The mechanical behaviour of cancellous bone. Journal of Biomechanics. 1985;18:317–328
  9. Gibson LJ. Biomechanics of cellular solids. Journal of Biomechanics. 2005;38:377–399
  10. Gibson LJ, Ashby MF. Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1997;
  11. Hutchinson, J.R., Miller, C.E., Fritsch, G., Hildebrandt, T., 2008. The anatomical foundation for multidisciplinary studies of animal limb function: examples from dinosaur and elephant limb imaging studies. In: Frey R., Endo, H. (Eds.), Digital Imaging and the Transformation of the Anatomical Sciences: Towards a New Morphology. Springer, Berlin (in press).
  12. Keenan MJ, Hegsted M, Jones KL, Delany JP, Kime JC, Melancon LE, et al. Comparison of bone density measurement techniques: DXA and Archimedes’ principle. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 1997;12:1903–1907
  13. Nicholson PHF, Cheng XG, Lowet. G, Boonen S, Davie MWJ, Dequeker J, et al. Structural and material properties of human vertebral cancellous bone. Medical Engineering and Physics. 1997;19:729–737
  14. Martens M, Van Audekercke R, Delport P, De Meester P, Mulier JC. The mechanical characteristics of cancellous bone at the upper femoral region. Journal of Biomechanics. 1983;16:971–983
  15. McNamara LM, Prendergast PJ, Schaffler MB. Bone tissue material properties are altered during osteoporosis. Journal of Musculoskeletal and Neuronal Interactions. 2005;5:342–343
  16. Mitton D, Rumerhart C, Hans D, Meunier PJ. The effects of density and test conditions on measured compression and shear strength of cancellous bone from the lumbar vertebrae of ewes. Medical Engineering and Physics. 1997;19:464–474
  17. Rice JC, Cowin SC, Bowman JA. On the dependence of the elasticity and strength of cancellous bone on apparent density. Journal of Biomechanics. 1988;21:155–168
  18. Schaffler MB, Burr DB. Stiffness of compact bone: effects of porosity and density. Journal of Biomechanics. 1988;21:13–16
  19. Schileo E, Taddei F, Malandrino A, Cristofolini L, Viceconti M. Subject-specific finite element models can accurately predict strain levels in long bones. Journal of Biomechanics. 2007;40:2982–2989
  20. Sharp DJ, Tanner KE, Bonfield W. Measurement of the density of trabecular bone. Journal of Biomechanics. 1990;23:853–857
  21. Wolf J. Das Gesetz der Transfomation der Knochen. Berlin: Hirchwald; 1892;
  22. Zioupos, P., Aspden, R.M., 2000. Density, material quality and quantity issues in OP cancellous bone. In: Proceedings of the European Society of Biomechanics, Dublin, Ireland, p. 327.
  23. Zioupos P, Cook R, Aspden RM, Coats AM. Bone quality issues and matrix properties in OP cancellous bone. In:  Hammer J,  Nerlich M,  Dendorfer S editor. Medicine meets Engineering. The Netherlands: IOS Press; 2008;p. 238–245

PII: S0021-9290(08)00157-7

doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.03.025

Journal of Biomechanics
Volume 41, Issue 9 , Pages 1961-1968 , 2008