Journal of Biomechanics
Volume 41, Issue 9 , Pages 1929-1936, 2008

Fracture toughness and work of fracture of hydrated, dehydrated, and ashed bovine bone

  • Jiahau Yan

      Affiliations

    • Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Indiana University, 1121 West Michigan Street #DS-109, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Department of Restorative Dentistry, Indiana University, 65 Larch Road, Sayre, PA 18840, USA. Tel.: +13528707000; fax: +13172787462.
  • ,
  • Amit Daga

      Affiliations

    • Department of Materials Science and Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Florida, USA
  • ,
  • Rajendra Kumar

      Affiliations

    • Department of Environmental Engineering, Montana Tech of the University of Montana, USA
  • ,
  • John J. Mecholsky

      Affiliations

    • Department of Materials Science and Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Florida, USA

Accepted 28 March 2008. published online 27 May 2008.

Abstract 

Bone, a tri-phase composite, consists of nano-sized apatite minerals, an organic component, and water. Heat-treated bovine cortical bone has been proposed as a candidate for void-filling bone substitute. However, the toughness of heat-treated bone is not yet fully studied. Fracture toughness (Kc) and work of fracture (Wf) of hydrated, dehydrated, and ashed bovine bone were estimated using a single-edge V-notched beam method. Thermal gravimetric analysis and differential thermal analysis were used to determine the temperature at which the organics and water were removed. Dehydrated specimens were obtained by placing the samples in a 60°C vacuum oven for 24h or a 110°C furnace for 2h. Ashed specimens were obtained by heat-treating samples at 600°C for 24h. Kc of bovine specimens decreased from 5.5MPa·m1/2 for hydrated bone, to 3.8MPa·m1/2 for dehydrated specimens, and to 0.36MPa·m1/2 for ashed specimens. Wf decreased from 7.1 to 1.1kJ/m2 for dehydrated specimens, and to 0.04kJ/m2 for ashed specimens. The main reasons for the significant decreases in Kc and Wf may be attributed to water's ability in stabilizing collagen structure and to the organics’ ability in making bone more ductile. Because of the large decrease in fracture toughness and work of fracture, we suggest that ashed bone is not appropriate for load-bearing bone substitute in areas where bone experiences loadings in flexure.

Keywords: Fracture toughness, Work of fracture, Bovine bone, Bone apatite, Bone substitute

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0021-9290(08)00162-0

doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.03.037

Journal of Biomechanics
Volume 41, Issue 9 , Pages 1929-1936, 2008