Journal of Biomechanics
Volume 41, Issue 16 , Pages 3332-3339 , 5 December 2008

The effect of femoral component malrotation on patellar biomechanics

  • Oliver Kessler

      Affiliations

    • Scientific Affairs, Stryker Europe, Thalwil, Switzerland
  • ,
  • Shantanu Patil

      Affiliations

    • Shiley Center for Orthopaedic Research & Education at Scripps Clinic, 11025 North Torrey Pines Road, Suite 140, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
  • ,
  • Clifford W. Colwell Jr.

      Affiliations

    • Shiley Center for Orthopaedic Research & Education at Scripps Clinic, 11025 North Torrey Pines Road, Suite 140, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
  • ,
  • Darryl D. D’Lima

      Affiliations

    • Shiley Center for Orthopaedic Research & Education at Scripps Clinic, 11025 North Torrey Pines Road, Suite 140, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +18583320166; fax: +18583320127.

,Accepted 29 September 2008.

References 

  1. Akagi M, Matsusue Y, Mata T, Asada Y, Horiguchi M, Iida H, et al. Effect of rotational alignment on patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1999;366:155–163
  2. Anouchi YS, Whiteside LA, Kaiser AD, Milliano MT. The effects of axial rotational alignment of the femoral component on knee stability and patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty demonstrated on autopsy specimens. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1993;287:170–177
  3. Armstrong AD, Brien HJ, Dunning CE, King GJ, Johnson JA, Chess DG. Patellar position after total knee arthroplasty: influence of femoral component malposition. J. Arthroplasty. 2003;18:458–465
  4. Barrack RL, Schrader T, Bertot AJ, Wolfe MW, Myers L. Component rotation and anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2001;392:46–55
  5. Berger RA, Crossett LS, Jacobs JJ, Rubash HE. Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1998;356:144–153
  6. Blankevoort L, Kuiper JH, Huiskes R, Grootenboer HJ. Articular contact in a three-dimensional model of the knee. J. Biomech. 1991;24:1019–1031
  7. Boyd AD, Ewald FC, Thomas WH, Poss R, Sledge CB. Long-term complications after total knee arthroplasty with or without resurfacing of the patella. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1993;75:674–681
  8. Brick GW, Scott RD. The patellofemoral component of total knee arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1988;231:163–178
  9. Buechel FF, Pappas MJ. New Jersey low contact stress knee replacement system. Ten-year evaluation of meniscal bearings. Orthop. Clin. North Am. 1989;20:147–177
  10. Buehler KO, Venn-Watson E, D’Lima DD, Colwell CW. The press-fit condylar total knee system: 8- to 10-year results with a posterior cruciate-retaining design. J. Arthroplasty. 2000;15:698–701
  11. Chauhan SK, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Beaver RJ. Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomised, prospective trial. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2004;86:372–377
  12. Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Mahfouz MR, Outten JT, Sharma A. Mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: do the polyethylene bearings rotate?. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2005;440:88–95
  13. D’Lima DD, Chen PC, Colwell CW. Polyethylene contact stresses, articular congruity, and knee alignment. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2001;392:232–238
  14. D’Lima DD, Chen PC, Kester MA, Colwell CW. Impact of patellofemoral design on patellofemoral forces and polyethylene stresses. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2003;85-A(Suppl 4):85–93
  15. D’Lima DD, Townsend CP, Arms SW, Morris BA, Colwell CW. An implantable telemetry device to measure intra-articular tibial forces. J. Biomech. 2005;38:299–304
  16. Fehring TK. Rotational malalignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2000;380:72–79
  17. Fehring TK, Odum S, Griffin WL, Mason JB, Nadaud M. Early failures in total knee arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2001;392:315–318
  18. Fregly BJ, Bei Y, Sylvester ME. Experimental evaluation of an elastic foundation model to predict contact pressures in knee replacements. J. Biomech. 2003;36:1659–1668
  19. Heegaard J, Leyvraz PF, Van Kampen A, Rakotomanana L, Rubin PJ, Blankevoort L. Influence of soft structures on patellar three-dimensional tracking. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1994;299:235–243
  20. Heegaard JH, Leyvraz PF, Hovey CB. A computer model to simulate patellar biomechanics following total knee replacement: the effects of femoral component alignment. Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon). 2001;16:415–423
  21. Insall J, Ranawat CS, Scott WN, Walker P. Total condylar knee replacement: preliminary report. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1976;120:149–154
  22. Kaufman KR, Kovacevic N, Irby SE, Colwell CW. Instrumented implant for measuring tibiofemoral forces. J. Biomech. 1996;29:667–671
  23. Matziolis G, Krocker D, Weiss U, Tohtz S, Perka C. A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2007;89:236–243
  24. Merkow RL, Soudry M, Insall JN. Patellar dislocation following total knee replacement. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1985;67:1321–1327
  25. Miller MC, Berger RA, Petrella AJ, Karmas A, Rubash HE. Optimizing femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2001;392:38–45
  26. Nagamine R, Whiteside LA, Otani T, White SE, McCarthy DS. Effect of medial displacement of the tibial tubercle on patellar position after rotational malposition of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty. 1996;11:104–110
  27. Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Stuart MJ, Hanssen AD, Jacofsky DJ. Rotating platform knees did not improve patellar tracking: a prospective, randomized study of 240 primary total knee arthroplasties. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2004;428:221–227
  28. Rhoads DD, Noble PC, Reuben JD, Tullos HS. The effect of femoral component position on the kinematics of total knee arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1993;286:122–129
  29. Rodricks DJ, Patil S, Pulido P, Colwell CW. Press-fit condylar design total knee arthroplasty. Fourteen to seventeen-year follow-up. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2007;89:89–95
  30. Singerman R, Pagan HD, Peyser AB, Goldberg VM. Effect of femoral component rotation and patellar design on patellar forces. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1997;334:345–353
  31. Siston RA, Patel JJ, Goodman SB, Delp SL, Giori NJ. The variability of femoral rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2005;87:2276–2280
  32. Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM. Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today?. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2002;404:7–13
  33. Stiehl JB, Komistek RD, Dennis DA, Keblish PA. Kinematics of the patellofemoral joint in total knee arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty. 2001;16:706–714

PII: S0021-9290(08)00500-9

doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.09.032

Journal of Biomechanics
Volume 41, Issue 16 , Pages 3332-3339 , 5 December 2008