Journal of Biomechanics
Volume 42, Issue 12 , Pages 1989-1995, 25 August 2009

Calcium response in single osteocytes to locally applied mechanical stimulus: Differences in cell process and cell body

  • Taiji Adachi

      Affiliations

    • Department of Mechanical Engineering and Science, Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University, Sakyo, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
    • Computational Cell Biomechanics Team, VCAD System Research Program, RIKEN, Hirosawa, Wako 351-0198, Japan
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Department of Mechanical Engineering and Science, Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University, Sakyo, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan. Tel./fax: +81757535216.
  • ,
  • Yuki Aonuma

      Affiliations

    • Department of Mechanical Engineering and Science, Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University, Sakyo, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
  • ,
  • Mototsugu Tanaka

      Affiliations

    • Department of Aeronautics, College of Engineering, Kanazawa Institute of Technology, Ougigaoka, Nonoichi, Ishikawa 921-8501, Japan
  • ,
  • Masaki Hojo

      Affiliations

    • Department of Mechanical Engineering and Science, Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University, Sakyo, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
  • ,
  • Teruko Takano-Yamamoto

      Affiliations

    • Division of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Graduate School of Dentistry, Tohoku University, Aoba, Sendai 980-8575, Japan
  • ,
  • Hiroshi Kamioka

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthodontics, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama 700-8525, Japan

Accepted 25 April 2009. published online 23 July 2009.

Abstract 

It is proposed that osteocytes embedded in the bone matrix have the ability to sense deformation and/or damage to the matrix and to feed these mechanical signals back to the adaptive bone remodeling process. When osteoblasts differentiate into osteocytes during the bone formation process, they change their morphology to a stellate form with many slender processes. This characteristic cell shape may underlie the differences in mechanosensitivity between the cell processes and cell body. To elucidate the mechanism of cellular response to mechanical stimulus in osteocytes, we investigated the site-dependent response to quantitatively controlled local mechanical stimulus in single osteocytes isolated from chick embryos, using the technique of calcium imaging. A mechanical stimulus was applied to a single osteocyte using a glass microneedle targeting a microparticle adhered to the cell membrane by modification with a monoclonal antibody OB7.3. Application of the local deformation induced calcium transients in the vicinity of the stimulated point and caused diffusive wave propagation of the calcium transient to the entire intracellular region. The rate of cell response to the stimulus was higher when applied to the cell processes than when applied to the cell body. In addition, a large deformation was necessary at the cell body to induce calcium transients, whereas a relatively small deformation was sufficient at the cell processes, suggesting that the mechanosensitivity of the cell processes was higher than that of the cell body. These results suggest that the cell shape with slender processes contributes to the site-dependent mechanosensitivity in osteocytes.

Keywords: Osteocytes, Bone cells, Calcium signaling response, Mechanical stimulus, Mechanotransduction, Cell biomechanics

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0021-9290(09)00250-4

doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.04.034

Journal of Biomechanics
Volume 42, Issue 12 , Pages 1989-1995, 25 August 2009