Journal of Biomechanics
Volume 43, Issue 1 , Pages 23-30 , 5 January 2010

Mechanics of microtubules

  • Taviare Hawkins

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physics, Mt. Holyoke College
  • ,
  • Matthew Mirigian

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physics, 302 Hasbrouck Laboratory 666 N. Pleasant St. University of Massachusetts Amherst, MA 01003, United States
  • ,
  • M. Selcuk Yasar

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physics, 302 Hasbrouck Laboratory 666 N. Pleasant St. University of Massachusetts Amherst, MA 01003, United States
  • ,
  • Jennifer L. Ross

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physics, 302 Hasbrouck Laboratory 666 N. Pleasant St. University of Massachusetts Amherst, MA 01003, United States
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.

,Accepted 21 August 2009.

References 

  1. Amos L, Klug A. Arrangement of subunits in flagellar microtubules. J. Cell Sci. 1974;14:523–549
  2. Amos LA, Hirose K. Studying the structure of microtubules by electron microscopy. Methods Mol. Med. 2007;137:65–91
  3. Asbury CL, Gestaut DR, Powers AF, Franck AD, Davis TN. The Dam1 kinetochore complex harnesses microtubule dynamics to produce force and movement. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2006;103:9873–9878
  4. Ault JG, Nicklas RB. Tension, microtubule rearrangements, and the proper distribution of chromosomes in mitosis. Chromosoma. 1989;98:33–39
  5. Baba SA. Flexural rigidity and elastic constant of cilia. J. Exp. Biol. 1972;56:459–467
  6. Bicek AD, Tüzel E, Kroll DM, Odde DJ. Analysis of microtubule curvature. Methods Cell Biol. 2007;83:237–268
  7. Brangwynne CP, MacKintosh FC, Kumar S, Geisse NA, Talbot J, Mahadevan L, et al. Microtubules can bear enhanced compressive loads in living cells because of lateral reinforcement. J. Cell Biol. 2006;173:733–741
  8. Brangwynne, C.P., Koenderink, G.H., Barry, E., Dogic, Z., MacKintosh, F.C., Weitz, D.A., 2007. Bending dynamics of fluctuating biopolymers probed by automated high-resolution filament tracking. Biophys. J. 93, 346–359.
  9. Brouhard GJ, Stear JH, Noetzel TL, Al-Bassam J, Kinoshita K, Harrison SC, et al. XMAP215 is a processive microtubule polymerase. Cell. 2008;132:79–88
  10. Cassimeris L. Regulation of microtubule dynamic instability. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton. 1993;26:275–281
  11. Cassimeris L, Gard D, Tran PT, Erickson HP. XMAP215 is a long thin molecule that does not increase microtubule stiffness. J. Cell Sci. 2001;114:3025–3033
  12. Chrétien D, Metoz F, Verde F, Karsenti E, Wade RH. Lattice defects in microtubules: protofilament numbers vary within individual microtubules. J. Cell Biol. 1992;117:1031–1040
  13. Cosentino Lagomarsino M, Tanase C, Vos JW, Emons AM, Mulder BM, Dogterom M. Microtubule organization in three-dimensional confined geometries: evaluating the role of elasticity through a combined in vitro and modeling approach. Biophys. J. 2007;92:1046–1057
  14. des Georges A, Katsuki M, Drummond DR, Osei M, Cross RA, Amos LA. Mal3, the Schizosaccharomyces pombe homolog of EB1, changes the microtubule lattice. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2008;15:1102–1108
  15. Dogterom M, Yurke B. Measurement of the force–velocity relation for growing microtubules. Science. 1997;278:856–860
  16. Dye RB, Fink SP, Williams RC. Taxol-induced flexibility of microtubules and its reversal by MAP-2 and Tau. J. Biol. Chem. 1993;268:6847–6850
  17. Elbaum M, Kuchnir Fygenson D, Libchaber A. Buckling microtubules in vesicles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996;76:4078–4081
  18. Faivre-Moskalenko C, Dogterom M. Dynamics of microtubule asters in microfabricated chambers: the role of catastrophes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2002;99:16788–16793Felgner H, Frank R, Schliwa M. Flexural rigidity of microtubules measured with the use of optical tweezers. J. Cell Sci. 1996;109(Pt 2):509–516
  19. Felgner, H., Frank, R., Schliwa, M., 1996. Flexural rigidity of microtubules measured with the use of optical tweezers. J. Cell Sci. 109 (Pt 2), 509–516.
  20. Felgner H, Frank R, Biernat J, Mandelkow EM, Mandelkow E, Ludin B, et al. Domains of neuronal microtubule-associated proteins and flexural rigidity of microtubules. J. Cell Biol. 1997;138:1067–1075
  21. Franck AD, Powers AF, Gestaut DR, Gonen T, Davis TN, Asbury CL. Tension applied through the Dam1 complex promotes microtubule elongation providing a direct mechanism for length control in mitosis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2007;9:832–837
  22. Gardel ML, Kasza KE, Brangwynne CVP, Liu J, Weitz DA. Mechanical response of cytoskeletal networks. Methods Cell Biol. 2008;89:487
  23. Gittes F. Flexural rigidity of microtubules and actin filaments measured from thermal fluctuations in shape. J. Cell Biol. 1993;120:923–934
  24. Gittes F, Meyhöfer E, Baek S, Howard J. Directional loading of the kinesin motor molecule as it buckles a microtubule. Biophys. J. 1996;70:418–429
  25. Grishchuk EL, Efremov AK, Volkov VA, Spiridonov IS, Gudimchuk N, Westermann S, et al. The Dam1 ring binds microtubules strongly enough to be a processive as well as energy-efficient coupler for chromosome motion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2008;105:15423–15428
  26. Helenius J, Brouhard G, Kalaidzidis Y, Diez S, Howard J. The depolymerizing kinesin MCAK uses lattice diffusion to rapidly target microtubule ends. Nature. 2006;441:115–119
  27. Hunter AW, Caplow M, Coy DL, Hancock WO, Diez S, Wordeman L, et al. The kinesin-related protein MCAK is a microtubule depolymerase that forms an ATP-hydrolyzing complex at microtubule ends. Mol. Cell. 2003;11:445–457
  28. Janson ME, Dogterom M. A bending mode analysis for growing microtubules: evidence for a velocity-dependent rigidity. Biophys. J. 2004;87:2723–2736
  29. Kaneko T, Itoh TJ, Hotani H. Morphological transformation of liposomes caused by assembly of encapsulated tubulin and determination of shape by microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs). J. Mol. Biol. 1998;284:1671–1681
  30. Kasas S, Dietler G. Techniques for measuring microtubule stiffness. Curr. Nanoscience. 2007;3:79–96
  31. Kawaguchi K, Ishiwata S, Yamashita T. Temperature dependence of the flexural rigidity of single microtubules. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2008;366:637–642
  32. Kerssemakers JW, Munteanu EL, Laan L, Noetzel TL, Janson ME, Dogterom M. Assembly dynamics of microtubules at molecular resolution. Nature. 2006;442:709–712
  33. Kikumoto M, Kurachi M, Tosa V, Tashiro H. Flexural rigidity of individual microtubules measured by a buckling force with optical traps. Biophys. J. 2006;90:1687–1696
  34. Kis A, Kasas S, Babi B, Kulik AJ, Benoît W, Briggs GA, et al. Nanomechanics of microtubules. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002;89:248101
  35. Kis A, Kasas S, Kulik AJ, Catsicas S, Forró L. Temperature-dependent elasticity of microtubules. Langmuir. 2008;24:6176–6181
  36. Kurachi M, Hoshi M, Tashiro H. Buckling of a single microtubule by optical trapping forces: Direct measurement of microtubule rigidity. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton. 1995;30:221–228
  37. Kurz, J.C., Williams, R.C., 1995. Microtubule-associated proteins and the flexibility of microtubules. Biochemistry 34, 13374-13380.
  38. Lansbergen G, Akhmanova A. Microtubule plus end: a hub of cellular activities. Traffic. 2006;7:499–507
  39. LeBoeuf AC, Levy SF, Gaylord M, Bhattacharya A, Singh AK, Jordan MA, et al. FTDP-17 mutations in Tau alter the regulation of microtubule dynamics: an “alternative core” model for normal and pathological Tau action. J. Biol. Chem. 2008;283:36406–36415
  40. Levy SF, Leboeuf AC, Massie MR, Jordan MA, Wilson L, Feinstein SC. Three-and four-repeat tau regulate the dynamic instability of two distinct microtubule subpopulations in qualitatively different manners. Implications for neurodegeneration. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:13520–13528
  41. Ligon LA, Karki S, Tokito M, Holzbaur EL. Dynein binds to beta-catenin and may tether microtubules at adherens junctions. Nat. Cell Biol. 2001;3:913–917
  42. Markus SM, Punch JJ, Lee WL. Motor-and tail-dependent targeting of dynein to microtubule plus ends and the cell cortex. Curr. Biol. 2009;19:196–205
  43. McCullough BR, Blanchoin L, Martiel JL, De la Cruz EM. Cofilin increases the bending flexibility of actin filaments: implications for severing and cell mechanics. J. Mol. Biol. 2008;381:550–558
  44. McNally FJ, Vale RD. Identification of katanin, an ATPase that severs and disassembles stable microtubules. Cell. 1993;75:419–429
  45. Meurer-Grob P, Kasparian J, Wade RH. Microtubule structure at improved resolution. Biochemistry. 2001;40:8000–8008
  46. Mickey B, Howard J. Rigidity of microtubules is increased by stabilizing agents. J. Cell Biol. 1995;130:909–917
  47. Mitchison T, Kirschner M. Dynamic instability of microtubule growth. Nature. 1984;312:237–242
  48. Mizushima-Sugano J, Maeda T, Miki-Noumura T. Flexural rigidity of singlet microtubules estimated from statistical analysis of their contour lengths and end-to-end distances. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1983;755:257–262
  49. Needleman DJ, Ojeda-Lopez MA, Raviv U, Ewert K, Miller HP, Wilson L, et al. Radial compression of microtubules and the mechanism of action of taxol and associated proteins. Biophys. J. 2005;89:3410–3423
  50. Odde DJ, Ma L, Briggs AH, DeMarco A, Kirschner MW. Microtubule bending and breaking in living fibroblast cells. J. Cell Sci. 1999;112(Pt 19):3283–3288
  51. de Pablo PJ, Schaap IA, MacKintosh FC, Schmidt CF. Deformation and collapse of microtubules on the nanometer scale. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2003;91:098101
  52. Pampaloni F, Lattanzi G, Jonás A, Surrey T, Frey E, Florin EL. Thermal fluctuations of grafted microtubules provide evidence of a length-dependent persistence length. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2006;103:10248–10253
  53. Roos W, Ulmer J, Gräter S, Surrey T, Spatz JP. Microtubule gliding and cross-linked microtubule networks on micropillar interfaces. Nano Lett. 2005;5:2630–2634
  54. Schaap IA, Carrasco C, de Pablo PJ, MacKintosh FC, Schmidt CF. Elastic response, buckling, and instability of microtubules under radial indentation. Biophys. J. 2006;91:1521–1531
  55. Schaap IA, de Pablo PJ, Schmidt CF. Resolving the molecular structure of microtubules under physiological conditions with scanning force microscopy. Eur. Biophys. J. 2004;33:462–467
  56. Schaap IA, Hoffmann B, Carrasco C, Merkel R, Schmidt CF. Tau protein binding forms a 1nm thick layer along protofilaments without affecting the radial elasticity of microtubules. J. Struct. Biol. 2007;158:282–292
  57. Scheele RB, Bergen LG, Borisy GG. Control of the structural fidelity of microtubules by initiation sites. J. Mol. Biol. 1982;154:485
  58. Vale RD, Coppin CM, Malik F, Kull FJ, Milligan RA. Tubulin GTP hydrolysis influences the structure, mechanical properties, and kinesin-driven transport of microtubules. J. Biol. Chem. 1994;269:23769–23775
  59. van den Heuvel, M.G., Bolhuis, S., Dekker, C., 2007. Persistence length measurements from stochastic single-microtubule trajectories. Nano Lett. 7, 3138–3144.
  60. van den Heuvel, M.G., de Graaff, M.P., Dekker, C., 2008. Microtubule curvatures under perpendicular electric forces reveal a low persistence length. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 7941–7946.
  61. van Mameren J, Vermeulen KC, Gittes F, Schmidt CF. Leveraging single protein polymers to measure flexural rigidity (dagger). J. Phys. Chem. B. 2009;
  62. VanBuren V, Cassimeris L, Odde DJ. Mechanochemical model of microtubule structure and self-assembly kinetics. Biophys. J. 2005;89:2911–2926
  63. Vandecandelaere A, Pedrotti B, Utton MA, Calvert RA, Bayley PM. Differences in the regulation of microtubule dynamics by microtubule-associated proteins MAP1B and MAP2. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton. 1996;35:134–146
  64. Venier P, Maggs AC, Carlier MF, Pantaloni D. Analysis of microtubule rigidity using hydrodynamic flow and thermal fluctuations. J. Biol. Mech. 1994;269:13353–13360
  65. Verhey KJ, Gaertig J. The tubulin code. Cell Cycle. 2007;6:2152–2160
  66. Westermann S, Wang HW, Avila-Sakar A, Drubin DG, Nogales E, Barnes G. The Dam1 kinetochore ring complex moves processively on depolymerizing microtubule ends. Nature. 2006;440:565–569

PII: S0021-9290(09)00496-5

doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.09.005

Journal of Biomechanics
Volume 43, Issue 1 , Pages 23-30 , 5 January 2010