Dynamic mechanical properties of the tissue-engineered matrix associated with individual chondrocytes
Abstract
The success of cell-based tissue engineering approaches in restoring biological function will be facilitated by a comprehensive fundamental knowledge of the temporal evolution of the structure and properties of the newly synthesized matrix. Here, we quantify the dynamic oscillatory mechanical behavior of the engineered matrix associated with individual chondrocytes cultured in vitro for up to 28 days in alginate scaffolds. The magnitude of the complex modulus (|E*|) and phase shift (δ) were measured in culture medium using Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM)-based nanoindentation in response to an imposed oscillatory deformation (amplitude ∼5
nm) as a function of frequency (f=1–316
Hz), probe tip geometry (2.5
μm radius sphere and 50
nm radius square pyramid), and in the absence and presence of growth factors (GF, insulin growth factor-1, IGF-1, and osteogenic protein-1, OP-1). |E*| for all conditions increased nonlinearly with frequency dependence approximately f1/2 and ranged between ∼1 and 25
kPa. This result, along with theoretical calculations of the characteristic poroelastic relaxation frequency, fp, (∼50–90
Hz) suggested that this time-dependent behavior was governed primarily by fluid flow-dependent poroelasticity, rather than flow-independent viscoelastic processes associated with the solid matrix. |E*(f)| increased, (f) decreased, and the hydraulic permeability, k, decreased with time in culture and with growth factor treatment. This trend of a more elastic-like response was thought to be associated with increased macromolecular biosynthesis, density, and a more mature matrix structure/organization.
Keywords: Chondrocytes, AFM, Dynamic compression, Pericellular matrix, Growth factors, Nanomechanics, Tissue engineering
Abbreviations: AFM, Atomic force microscopy, PCM, Pericellular matrix, ECM, Extracellular matrix, FBS, Fetal bovine serum, IGF-1, Insulin-like growth factor, OP-1, Osteogenic protein-1, GF, Growth factor, SEM, Standard error of mean
To access this article, please choose from the options below
PII: S0021-9290(09)00574-0
doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.09.053
© 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
