Journal of Biomechanics
Volume 43, Issue 5 , Pages 826-835 , 22 March 2010

Structural behaviour and strain distribution of the long bones of the human lower limbs

  • Luca Cristofolini

      Affiliations

    • Laboratorio di Tecnologia Medica, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via di Barbiano, 1/10, 40136 Bologna, Italy
    • Facoltà di Ingegneria, Università di Bologna, Italy
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Laboratorio di Tecnologia Medica, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via di Barbiano, 1/10, 40136 Bologna, Italy. Tel.: +390516366864; fax: +390516366863.
    • ,
  • Giorgia Conti

      Affiliations

    • Laboratorio di Tecnologia Medica, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via di Barbiano, 1/10, 40136 Bologna, Italy
    • Facoltà di Ingegneria, Università di Bologna, Italy
    • ,
  • Mateusz Juszczyk

      Affiliations

    • Laboratorio di Tecnologia Medica, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via di Barbiano, 1/10, 40136 Bologna, Italy
    • Facoltà di Ingegneria, Università di Bologna, Italy
    • ,
  • Sara Cremonini

      Affiliations

    • Laboratorio di Tecnologia Medica, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via di Barbiano, 1/10, 40136 Bologna, Italy
    • ,
  • Serge Van Sint Jan

      Affiliations

    • Laboratory of Anatomy, Biomechanics and Organogenesis, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium
    • ,
  • Marco Viceconti

      Affiliations

    • Laboratorio di Tecnologia Medica, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via di Barbiano, 1/10, 40136 Bologna, Italy

,Accepted 20 November 2009.

References 

  1. Bayraktar HH, Morgan EF, Niebur GL, Morris GE, Keaveny TM. Elastic and yield properties of human trabecular and cortical bone. J. Biomech. 2004;37:27–35
  2. Bergmann G, Heller M, Graichen F, Rohlmann A, Strauss J, Duda GN. Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. J. Biomech. 2001;34:859–871
  3. Bergmann G, Graichen F, Rohlmann A. Hip contact forces during stumbling. Langenbeck’s Arch. Surg. 2004;389:51–59
  4. Carter DR, Spengler DM. Mechanical properties and composition of cortical bone. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1978;135:192–217
  5. Cherraf-Schweyer C, Maurice G, Taghite M, Taous K. An experimental and theoretical approach of elasticity and viscoelasticity of compact and spongy bone with periodic homogenization. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 2007;10:195–207
  6. Cody DD, Gross GJ, Hou FJ, Spencer HJ, Fyhrie DP. Femoral strength is better predicted by finite element models than QCT and DXA. J. Biomech. 1999;32:1013–1020
  7. Conti G, Cristofolini L, Juszczyk M, Viceconti M. Comparison of three standard anatomical reference frames for the tibia–fibula complex. J. Biomech. 2008;41:3384–3389
  8. Cristofolini L. A critical analysis of stress shielding evaluation of hip prostheses. Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 1997;25(4 and 5):409–483
  9. Cristofolini L, Cappello A, McNamara B, Toni A. A minimal parametric model of the femur to describe axial elastic strain in response to loads. Med. Eng. Phys. 1996;18:502–514
  10. Cristofolini L, Juszczyk M, Taddei F, Viceconti M. In vitro replication of spontaneous fractures of the proximal human femur. J. Biomech. 2007;40:2837–2845
  11. Cristofolini L, Juszczyk M, Taddei F, Viceconti M. Strain distribution in the proximal human femoral metaphysis. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. [H]. 2009;223:273–288
  12. Cristofolini L, Viceconti M. Mechanical validation of whole bone composite tibia models. J. Biomech. 2000;33:279–288
  13. Cristofolini L, Viceconti M, Cappello A, Toni A. Mechanical validation of whole bone composite femur models. J. Biomech. 1996;29:525–535
  14. Eckstein F, Wunderer C, Boehm H, Kuhn V, Priemel M, Link TM, et al. Reproducibility and side differences of mechanical tests for determining the structural strength of the proximal femur. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2004;19:379–385
  15. Fabeck L, Tolley M, Rooze M, Burny F. Theoretical study of the decrease in the femoral neck anteversion during growth. Cells Tissues Organs. 2002;171:269–275
  16. Field RE, Rushton N. Proximal femoral surface strain gauge analysis of a new epiphyseal prosthesis. J. Biomed. Eng. 1989;11:123–129
  17. Fung YC. Bone and cartilage. Biomechanics—Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues. New York: Springer Verlag; 1980;pp. 383–415
  18. Fung YC. Biomechanics: Motion, Flow, Stress, and Growth. New York: Springer; 1990;
  19. Gray HA, Taddei F, Zavatsky AB, Gill HS. Experimental validation of a finite element model of a human cadaveric tibia. J. Biomech. Eng. 2008;130:pp. 031016-11
  20. Guedes RM, Simoes JA, Morais JL. Viscoelastic behaviour and failure of bovine cancellous bone under constant strain rate. J. Biomech. 2006;39:49–60
  21. Heiner AD, Brown TD. Structural properties of a new design of composite replicate femurs and tibias. J. Biomech. 2001;34:773–781
  22. Helgason B, Perilli E, Schileo E, Taddei F, Viceconti M. Relationships between bone density and mechanical properties: a review. Clin. Biomech. 2008;23:135–146
  23. Huiskes R, Janssen JD, Sloof TJ. A detailed comparison of experimental and theoretical stress-analyses of a human femur. In:  Cowin SC editors. Mechanical Properties of Bone. New York: A.S.M.E.; 1981;p. 211–234
  24. Keaveny TM, Guo XE, McMahon TA, Hayes WC. Trabecular bone exhibits fully linear elastic behavior and yields at low strains. J. Biomech. 1994;27:1127–1136
  25. Keyak JH, Kaneko TS, Tehranzadeh J, Skinner HB. Predicting proximal femoral strength using structural engineering models. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2005;219–228
  26. Lakes RS, Katz JL. Viscoelastic properties of wet cortical bone. III. A non-linear constitutive equation. J. Biomech. 1979;12:689–698
  27. Lanyon IE. Bone remodelling, mechanical stress, and osteoporosis. In:  De Luca HF editors. Osteoporosis. Baltimore: University Park Press; 1980;p. 129–138
  28. Lochmüller E-M, Groll O, Kuhn V, Eckstein F. Mechanical strength of the proximal femur as predicted from geometric and densitometric bone properties at the lower limb versus the distal radius. Bone. 2002;30:207–216
  29. Markel MD, Sielman E, Rapoff AJ, Kohles SS. Mechanical properties of long bones in dogs. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1994;55:1178–1183
  30. Martens M, Van Audekercke R, De Meester P, Mulier JC. Mechanical behaviour of femoral bones in bending loading. J. Biomech. 1986;19:443–454
  31. Martens M, VanAudekercke R, Delport P, De Meester P, Mulier JC. The mechanical characteristics of cancellous bone at the upper femur. J. Biomech. 1983;16:971–983
  32. Martens M, van Audekerke R, de Meester P, Mulier JC. The mechanical characteristics of the long bones of the lower extremity in torsion. J. Biomech. 1980;13:667–676
  33. NIH, 2000. Consensus Statement on Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis, and Therapy. NIH Consensus Statement Online, US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute of Health, 2000 March 27–29. vol. 17(1), pp. 1–36.
  34. Ohman C, Dall'Ara E, Baleani M, Van Sint Jan S, Viceconti M. The effects of embalming using a 4% formalin solution on the compressive mechanical properties of human cortical bone. Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon). 2008;23:1294–1298
  35. Raftopoulos D, Katsamanis E, Saul F, Liu W, Saddemi S. An intermediate loading rate technique for the determination of mechanical properties of human femoral cortical bone. J. Biomed. Eng. 1993;15:60–66
  36. Raftopoulos DD, Qassem W. Three-dimensional curved beam stress analysis of the human femur. J. Biomed. Eng. 1987;9:356–366
  37. Reilly DT, Burstein AH. The elastic and ultimate properties of compact bone tissue. J. Biomech. 1975;8:393–405
  38. Rockwood CAJ, Green DP, Bucholz RW. Rockwood and Green’s Fractures in Adults. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott; 1991;
  39. Sasaki N, Nakayama Y, Yoshikawa M, Enyo A. Stress relaxation function of bone and bone collagen. J. Biomech. 1993;26:1369–1376
  40. Schileo E, Taddei F, Cristofolini L, Viceconti M. Subject-specific finite element models implementing a maximum principal strain criterion are able to estimate failure risk and fracture location on human femurs tested in vitro. J. Biomech. 2008;41:356–367
  41. Schileo E, Taddei F, Malandrino A, Cristofolini L, Viceconti M. Subject-specific finite element models can accurately predict strain levels in long bones. J. Biomech. 2007;40:2982–2989
  42. Taddei F, Cristofolini L, Martelli S, Gill HS, Viceconti M. Subject-specific finite element models of long bones: an in vitro evaluation of the overall accuracy. J. Biomech. 2006;39:2457–2467
  43. Timoshenko PS, Goodier JN. Theory of Elasticity. New York: Mc Graw Hill; 1982;
  44. Toridis TG. Stress analysis of the femur. J. Biomech. 1969;2:163–174
  45. Viceconti M, Taddei F, Van Sint Jan S, Leardini A, Cristofolini L, Stea S, et al. Multiscale modelling of the skeleton for the prediction of the risk of fracture. Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon). 2008;
  46. Yang K-H-, Shen KL, Demetropoulos CK, King AI, Kolodziej P, Levine RS, et al. The relationship between loading conditions and fracture patterns of the proximal femur. J. Biomech. Eng. 1996;118:575–578

PII: S0021-9290(09)00668-X

doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.11.022

Journal of Biomechanics
Volume 43, Issue 5 , Pages 826-835 , 22 March 2010

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution