Journal of Biomechanics
Volume 43, Issue 7 , Pages 1292-1301, 7 May 2010

Non-invasive assessment of soft-tissue artifact and its effect on knee joint kinematics during functional activity

  • Massoud Akbarshahi

      Affiliations

    • Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia
  • ,
  • Anthony G. Schache

      Affiliations

    • Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia
  • ,
  • Justin W. Fernandez

      Affiliations

    • Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia
  • ,
  • Richard Baker

      Affiliations

    • Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia
    • Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia
  • ,
  • Scott Banks

      Affiliations

    • Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
  • ,
  • Marcus G. Pandy

      Affiliations

    • Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +61383444054; fax: +61393477717.

Accepted 27 January 2010. published online 08 March 2010.

Abstract 

The soft-tissue interface between skin-mounted markers and the underlying bones poses a major limitation to accurate, non-invasive measurement of joint kinematics. The aim of this study was twofold: first, to quantify lower limb soft-tissue artifact in young healthy subjects during functional activity; and second, to determine the effect of soft-tissue artifact on the calculation of knee joint kinematics. Subject-specific bone models generated from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were used in conjunction with X-ray images obtained from single-plane fluoroscopy to determine three-dimensional knee joint kinematics for four separate tasks: open-chain knee flexion, hip axial rotation, level walking, and a step-up. Knee joint kinematics was derived using the anatomical frames from the MRI-based, 3D bone models together with the data from video motion capture and X-ray fluoroscopy. Soft-tissue artifact was defined as the degree of movement of each marker in the anteroposterior, proximodistal and mediolateral directions of the corresponding anatomical frame. A number of different skin-marker clusters (total of 180) were used to calculate knee joint rotations, and the results were compared against those obtained from fluoroscopy. Although a consistent pattern of soft-tissue artifact was found for each task across all subjects, the magnitudes of soft-tissue artifact were subject-, task- and location-dependent. Soft-tissue artifact for the thigh markers was substantially greater than that for the shank markers. Markers positioned in the vicinity of the knee joint showed considerable movement, with root mean square errors as high as 29.3mm. The maximum root mean square errors for calculating knee joint rotations occurred for the open-chain knee flexion task and were 24.3°, 17.8° and 14.5° for flexion, internal–external rotation and abduction–adduction, respectively. The present results on soft-tissue artifact, based on fluoroscopic measurements in healthy adult subjects, may be helpful in developing location- and direction-specific weighting factors for use in global optimization algorithms aimed at minimizing the effects of soft-tissue artifact on calculations of knee joint rotations.

Keywords: X-ray fluoroscopy, Motion capture, Gait analysis, Skin-mounted markers

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0021-9290(10)00033-3

doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.01.002

Journal of Biomechanics
Volume 43, Issue 7 , Pages 1292-1301, 7 May 2010