Journal of Biomechanics
Volume 43, Issue 8 , Pages 1573-1579, 28 May 2010

Filtering the surface EMG signal: Movement artifact and baseline noise contamination

  • Carlo J. De Luca

      Affiliations

    • Delsys Inc., Boston MA, USA
    • NeuroMuscular Research Center, Boston University, 19 Deerfield St, Boston MA, USA
  • ,
  • L. Donald Gilmore

      Affiliations

    • NeuroMuscular Research Center, Boston University, 19 Deerfield St, Boston MA, USA
  • ,
  • Mikhail Kuznetsov

      Affiliations

    • NeuroMuscular Research Center, Boston University, 19 Deerfield St, Boston MA, USA
  • ,
  • Serge H. Roy

      Affiliations

    • NeuroMuscular Research Center, Boston University, 19 Deerfield St, Boston MA, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +16173580718; fax: +16173535737.

Accepted 5 January 2010. published online 08 March 2010.

Abstract 

The surface electromyographic (sEMG) signal that originates in the muscle is inevitably contaminated by various noise signals or artifacts that originate at the skin-electrode interface, in the electronics that amplifies the signals, and in external sources. Modern technology is substantially immune to some of these noises, but not to the baseline noise and the movement artifact noise. These noise sources have frequency spectra that contaminate the low-frequency part of the sEMG frequency spectrum. There are many factors which must be taken into consideration when determining the appropriate filter specifications to remove these artifacts; they include the muscle tested and type of contraction, the sensor configuration, and specific noise source. The band-pass determination is always a compromise between (a) reducing noise and artifact contamination, and (b) preserving the desired information from the sEMG signal. This study was designed to investigate the effects of mechanical perturbations and noise that are typically encountered during sEMG recordings in clinical and related applications. The analysis established the relationship between the attenuation rates of the movement artifact and the sEMG signal as a function of the filter band pass. When this relationship is combined with other considerations related to the informational content of the signal, the signal distortion of filters, and the kinds of artifacts evaluated in this study, a Butterworth filter with a corner frequency of 20Hz and a slope of 12dB/oct is recommended for general use. The results of this study are relevant to biomechanical and clinical applications where the measurements of body dynamics and kinematics may include artifact sources.

Keywords: EMG signal, Movement artifact, Baseline noise, Filtering

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0021-9290(10)00063-1

doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.01.027

Journal of Biomechanics
Volume 43, Issue 8 , Pages 1573-1579, 28 May 2010