Journal of Biomechanics
Volume 43, Issue 9 , Pages 1717-1722, 18 June 2010

The in vivo assessment of mechanical loadings on pectoral pacemaker implants

  • Michael Hamman de Vaal

      Affiliations

    • Cardiovascular Research Unit, Chris Barnard Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
  • ,
  • James Neville

      Affiliations

    • Cardiac Rhythm Disease Management, Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA
  • ,
  • Jacques Scherman

      Affiliations

    • Cardiovascular Research Unit, Chris Barnard Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
  • ,
  • Peter Zilla

      Affiliations

    • Cardiovascular Research Unit, Chris Barnard Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
  • ,
  • Micah Litow

      Affiliations

    • Neuromodulation Division, Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA
  • ,
  • Thomas Franz

      Affiliations

    • Cardiovascular Research Unit, Chris Barnard Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Cardiovascular Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Private Bag X3, 7935 Observatory, South Africa. Tel.: +27214066418; fax: +27214485935.

Accepted 17 February 2010. published online 04 March 2010.

Abstract 

Reduced sizes of implantable cardiac pacemakers and clinical advances have led to a higher feasibility of using such devices in younger patients including children. Increased structural demands deriving from reduced device size and more active recipients require detailed knowledge of in vivo mechanical conditions to ensure device reliability. Objective of this study was the proof of feasibility of a system for the measurement of in vivo mechanical loadings on pacemaker implants. The system comprised the following: implantable instrumented pacemaker (IPM) with six force sensors, accelerometer and radio-frequency (RF) transceiver; RF data logging system and video capture system. Three Chacma baboons (20.6±1.15kg) received one pectoral sub-muscular IPM implant. After wound healing, forces were measured during physical activities. Forces during range of motion of the arm were assessed on the anaesthetized animals prior to device explantation. Mass, volume and dimensions of the excised Pectoralis major muscles were determined after device explantation. Remote IPM activation and data acquisition were reliable in the indoor cage environment with transceiver distances of up to 3m. Sampling rates of up to 1000Hz proved sufficient to capture dynamic in vivo loadings. Compressive forces on the IPM in conscious animals reached a maximum of 77.2±54.6N during physical activity and were 22.2±7.3N at rest, compared with 34.6±15.7N maximum during range of motion and 13.4±3.3N at rest in anaesthetized animals. The study demonstrated the feasibility of the developed system for the assessment of in vivo mechanical loading conditions of implantable pacemakers with potential for use for other implantable therapeutic devices.

Keywords: Implantable device, In vivo force, Mechanical loading, Pacemaker, ICD, IPG

Abbreviations: AT, total area of principal surface of IPM, ASi, surface area of force sensor cover plate, ETO, ethylene oxide, FSi, transverse force acting on force sensor i, FT, transverse force acting on IPM, FT,rest,, transverse force on IPM at rest, ICD, implantable cardioverter defibrillator, IPG, implantable pulse generator, IPM, implantable instrumented pacemaker, Lm, length of Pectoralis major along the estimated line of action, Mm, mass of Pectoralis major, P. major, Pectoralis major, PC personal computer, R2, coefficient of determination, RF, radio frequency, ROM, range of motion, tm, thickness of Pectoralis major at the location of the IPM implant, Vm, volume of Pectoralis major, Vrest, sensor voltage at rest, ΔFT, difference in transverse force

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0021-9290(10)00111-9

doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.02.028

Journal of Biomechanics
Volume 43, Issue 9 , Pages 1717-1722, 18 June 2010