Journal of Biomechanics
Volume 43, Issue 12 , Pages 2281-2287, 26 August 2010

Computational fluid dynamics analysis of cyclist aerodynamics: Performance of different turbulence-modelling and boundary-layer modelling approaches

  • Thijs Defraeye

      Affiliations

    • Laboratory of Building Physics, Department of Civil Engineering, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 40, 3001 Heverlee, Belgium
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +3216321348; fax: +3216321980.
  • ,
  • Bert Blocken

      Affiliations

    • Building Physics and Systems, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 Eindhoven, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Erwin Koninckx

      Affiliations

    • Research Centre for Exercise and Health, Department of Biomedical Kinesiology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Tervuursevest 101, 3001 Heverlee, Belgium
  • ,
  • Peter Hespel

      Affiliations

    • Research Centre for Exercise and Health, Department of Biomedical Kinesiology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Tervuursevest 101, 3001 Heverlee, Belgium
  • ,
  • Jan Carmeliet

      Affiliations

    • Chair of Building Physics, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich (ETHZ), Wolfgang-Pauli-Strasse 15, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland
    • Laboratory for Building Science and Technology, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Testing and Research (Empa), Überlandstrasse 129, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland

Accepted 29 April 2010. published online 20 May 2010.

Abstract 

This study aims at assessing the accuracy of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) for applications in sports aerodynamics, for example for drag predictions of swimmers, cyclists or skiers, by evaluating the applied numerical modelling techniques by means of detailed validation experiments. In this study, a wind-tunnel experiment on a scale model of a cyclist (scale 1:2) is presented. Apart from three-component forces and moments, also high-resolution surface pressure measurements on the scale model’s surface, i.e. at 115 locations, are performed to provide detailed information on the flow field. These data are used to compare the performance of different turbulence-modelling techniques, such as steady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS), with several kε and kω turbulence models, and unsteady large-eddy simulation (LES), and also boundary-layer modelling techniques, namely wall functions and low-Reynolds number modelling (LRNM). The commercial CFD code Fluent 6.3 is used for the simulations. The RANS shear-stress transport (SST) kω model shows the best overall performance, followed by the more computationally expensive LES. Furthermore, LRNM is clearly preferred over wall functions to model the boundary layer. This study showed that there are more accurate alternatives for evaluating flow around bluff bodies with CFD than the standard kε model combined with wall functions, which is often used in CFD studies in sports.

Keywords: Computational fluid dynamics, Turbulence model, Cyclist, Aerodynamics, Wind tunnel

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0021-9290(10)00262-9

doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.04.038

Journal of Biomechanics
Volume 43, Issue 12 , Pages 2281-2287, 26 August 2010