Journal of Biomechanics
Volume 45, Issue 3 , Pages 440-447, 2 February 2012

Influence of stent configuration on cerebral aneurysm fluid dynamics

  • M. Haithem Babiker

      Affiliations

    • School of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence to: School of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, 501 E. Tyler, ECG 334, P.O. Box 879709, Tempe, AZ 85287-9709, USA. Tel.: +1 347 495 6156; fax: +1 917 591 8336.
  • ,
  • L. Fernando Gonzalez

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neurological Surgery, Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia, PA, United States
  • ,
  • Justin Ryan

      Affiliations

    • School of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States
  • ,
  • Felipe Albuquerque

      Affiliations

    • Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, United States
  • ,
  • Daniel Collins

      Affiliations

    • Partnership for Research in Spatial Modeling, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States
  • ,
  • Arius Elvikis

      Affiliations

    • Partnership for Research in Spatial Modeling, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States
  • ,
  • David H. Frakes

      Affiliations

    • School of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States
    • School of Electrical, Computer, and Energy Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States

Accepted 15 December 2011. published online 09 January 2012.

Abstract 

Embolic coiling is the most popular endovascular treatment available for cerebral aneurysms. Nevertheless, the embolic coiling of wide-neck aneurysms is challenging and, in many cases, ineffective. Use of highly porous stents to support coiling of wide-neck aneurysms has become a common procedure in recent years. Several studies have also demonstrated that high porosity stents alone can significantly alter aneurysmal hemodynamics, but differences among different stent configurations have not been fully characterized. As a result, it is usually unclear which stent configuration is optimal for treatment. In this paper, we present a flow study that elucidates the influence of stent configuration on cerebral aneurysm fluid dynamics in an idealized wide-neck basilar tip aneurysm model. Aneurysmal fluid dynamics for three different stent configurations (half-Y, Y and, cross-bar) were first quantified using particle image velocimetry and then compared. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations were also conducted for selected stent configurations to facilitate validation and provide more detailed characterizations of the fluid dynamics promoted by different stent configurations. In vitro results showed that the Y stent configuration reduced cross-neck flow most significantly, while the cross-bar configuration reduced velocity magnitudes within the aneurysmal sac most significantly. The half-Y configuration led to increased velocity magnitudes within the aneurysmal sac at high parent-vessel flow rates. Experimental results were in strong agreement with CFD simulations. Simulated results indicated that differences in fluid dynamic performance among the different stent configurations can be attributed primarily to protruding struts within the bifurcation region.

Keywords: PIV, CFD, Endovascular stents, Stent configuration, Cerebral aneurysms

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0021-9290(11)00784-6

doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.12.016

Journal of Biomechanics
Volume 45, Issue 3 , Pages 440-447, 2 February 2012