Elsevier

Journal of Biomechanics

Volume 48, Issue 14, 5 November 2015, Pages 3743-3750
Journal of Biomechanics

Kinematic hand parameters in front crawl at different paces of swimming

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.07.034Get rights and content

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the evolution of kinematic hand parameters (sweepback angle, angle of attack, velocity, acceleration and orientation of the hand relative to the absolute coordinate system) throughout an aquatic stroke and to study the possible modifications caused by a variation of the swimming pace. Seventeen competitive swimmers swam at long distance, middle distance and sprint paces. Parameters were calculated from the trajectory of seven markers on the hand measured with an optoelectronic system. Results showed that kinematic hand parameters evolve differently depending on the pace. Angle of attack, sweepback angle, acceleration and orientation of the hand do not vary significantly. The velocity of the hand increases when the pace increases, but only during the less propulsive phases (entry and stretch and downsweep to catch). The more the pace increases and the more the absolute durations of the entry and stretch and downsweep to catch phases decrease. Absolute durations of the insweep and upsweep phases remain constant. During these phases, the propulsive hand forces calculated do not vary significantly when the pace increases. The increase of swimming pace is then explained by the swimmer's capacity to maintain propulsive phases rather than increasing the force generation within each cycle.

Introduction

Propulsion in front crawl swimming is mainly provided by the upper limbs (Maglischo, 2003, Nakashima et al., 2012). Hands play an important role in this context. (Berger et al., 1995, Toussaint et al., 2000). In front crawl, the hand enters into the water in front of the swimmer and exits behind him. The aquatic strokes of the arms generate propulsive forces, which are defined as the component of resultant force in the swimming direction (Berger et al., 1999). Many authors have studied the links between these kinematic data (i.e., aquatic strokes) and the propulsive forces. According to Toussaint et al. (2000), the propulsive forces generated by the hand during a pull may be estimated given the lift and drag coefficients, velocity, and orientation of the hand during the stroke. Moreover, according to Schleihauf (1979), Berger et al. (1995) and Payton and Bartlett (1995) the drag and lift coefficients are dependent on the angle of attack and the sweepback angle. It was further shown that the acceleration of the hand played a significant role in propulsion, in particular through the added mass effect (Gardano and Dabnichki, 2006, Rouboa et al., 2006, Kudo et al., 2013, Sanders, 1999). Thus, knowledge of the angles of attack and sweepback angles, in addition to the velocity, acceleration, and orientation of the hand relative to the absolute coordinate system (these five parameters will be called “kinematic hand parameters”), will permit the analysis of both the technique of swimmers, and their effects on the resultant hand forces.

Indeed, kinematic hand parameters have been used in the calculation or measurements of forces, either experimentally, using numerical simulation, or theoretically. For example: Schleihauf et al. (1983), Berger et al. (1995) and Sanders (1999) have made dynamometric measurements in a towing tank from a modeled arm; Kudo and Lee (2010) have performed measurements from pressure sensors attached on a robotic arm; and, Bixler and Riewald (2002), Bilinauskaite et al. (2013), calculated lift and drag coefficients from a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) study. It appears that the data obtained in unsteady conditions yield results closer to reality than those in quasi-steady conditions (Gourgoulis et al., 2015). Sanders (1999) has proposed an analytical unsteady method that calculates the forces created by the hands from the angle of attack, sweepback angle, velocity and acceleration of the hand. We will use this method in the discussion to analyze the effect of measured kinematic parameters on the propulsive effort, and identify if there are differences between three swimming paces.

These kinematic hand parameters have been defined by different authors. The sweepback angle defines the leading edge of the hand relative to the water flow (Schleihauf et al., 1983). The angle of attack (preferred over pitch term) is the angle between the hand plane and the flow (Schleihauf et al., 1983, Lauder et al., 2001). The velocity of the hand is defined as the mean of the resultant velocities of the 2nd and the 5th metacarpophalangeal joints (Payton and Bartlett, 1995). Acceleration is thus the temporal derivative of this velocity. The orientation of the hand will be defined from three Euler angles (flexion, rotation and abduction) that will locate the hand relative to the absolute coordinate system.

Despite the importance of these parameters in a coupled dynamic–kinematic study, there appear to be relatively few studies that have been conducted on a significant population. Previous studies have often investigated the kinematic data of only one or two swimmers (Schleihauf et al., 1983, Maglischo, 2003, Kudo and Lee, 2010), or a single pace (Gourgoulis et al., 2008, Gourgoulis et al., 2010, Gourgoulis et al., 2015), or on certain times of the path (Maglischo, 2003). There is not, to our knowledge, a study of a significant population (with sufficient swimmers) encompassing different paces that reports on the full range of kinematic hand parameters. Access to this type of data should allow a better understanding of how to organize competitive swimmers to perform and could serve coaches. In addition, they could also be used to calculate (or measure) and compare the forces generated by the hand at different swimming paces. Many studies have shown that the basic kinematic parameters evolve when the swimming pace increases (increasing of the stroke frequency and decreasing of the stroke length when the pace increases; Seifert and Chollet (2009)), but what about those kinematic hand parameters?

Thus, the purpose of the current research is to investigate the evolution of kinematic hand parameters over time, on a significant population of competitive swimmers. It was hypothesized that the modification of the pace implies a modification of these parameters.

Section snippets

Participants

Seventeen swimmers (nine men and eight women) participated in this study. Anthropometric details and experience level of each swimmer are given in the Table 1. All participants (or their parents) provided written consent prior to their participation. The test procedures were approved by the university ethics committee.

Test procedure

Experimentations were conducted in a specific pool of the Pprime Institute. Swimmers were asked to perform three trials at the three characteristic paces of swimming: sprint

Preliminary results

Preliminary results will concern, for the seventeen swimmers, the stroke frequency and the velocity of swimming. The mean of absolute duration of each phase will then be presented.

The uncertainty of measured angles is 1.4° for the angle of attack, and 2.1° for the sweepback angle, and 0.05 m s−1 for the velocity (Monnet et al., 2014). Results show that the requested paces have been respected and that they are representative of their competition pace (Table 2).

Absolute duration of each phase

The more the pace increases, the more

Discussion

The discussion will compare the evolution of the kinematic hand parameters relative to a previous study, by phase and by pace. To discuss the propulsion effects of these parameters, we calculate the propulsive forces from the kinematic hand parameters. For this, we draw on the unsteady method of Sanders (1999), which calculated resultant forces from the sweepback angle, the angle of attack, the velocity, and the acceleration of the hand and the hydrodynamic coefficients. The calculations were

Conclusion

Kinematic hand parameters are at the crossroads of the technical swimmer and the forces made by the water applied on the swimmer, which serve especially during the propulsion phases. It had been already shown when the pace increases, the swimmers' technique modifies, including an increase in stroke frequency and a shortening of the stroke length. We wanted to know whether the change of pace that induced this modification in behavior also induced changes to the kinematic parameters of the hand

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank the Stade Poitevin Swimming Club, and especially the coach Didier Stefanini and all swimmers who have participated in this study.

References (24)

  • V. Gourgoulis et al.

    Kinematic characteristics of the stroke and orientation of the hand during front crawl resisted swimming

    J. Sports Sci.

    (2010)
  • V. Gourgoulis et al.

    The influence of the hand’s acceleration and the relative contribution of drag and lift forces in front crawl swimming

    J. Sports Sci.

    (2015)
  • Cited by (14)

    • Classifying motor coordination impairment in Para swimmers with brain injury

      2019, Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
      Citation Excerpt :

      In agreement with previous research,23,24 motor coordination tests relevant to the upper limbs were found to be more important predictors of freestyle swim speed than lower limb test performance (Supplementary material Fig. S4). Indeed, the upper limbs contribute most of the propulsive force during freestyle swimming,25 and motor coordination impairment of the upper limbs might impact on hand speeds during the above and underwater stroke phases and inter-arm coordination associated with propulsion and propelling efficiency.14,15,26 It is interesting that lower limb tapping tasks had moderate to high correlations (r = −0.57 to −0.62, p < 0.01) with maximal swim speed contrasting with no or low correlations (r = 0.27 to 0.44) that have been reported previously for lower limb strength tests in a similar cohort of Para swimmers.23

    • Analysis of a swimmer's hand and forearm in impulsive start from rest using computational fluid dynamics in unsteady flow conditions

      2018, Journal of Biomechanics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Xh is the axis which passed through finger tip (FT) and W (wrist) which is the middle of [RS, US] segment (RS: radial styloid, US: ulnar styloid). Zh was perpendicular to the (Xh, RS-US) plane and Yh was perpendicular to Xh and Zh (Monnet et al., 2014; Samson et al., 2015). Xf, is the axis from E (elbow) to W, Yf is perpendicular to the Xf-axis, oriented from US to RS, and Zf is perpendicular to Xf and Yf, oriented from below to the top of the forearm.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text