Elsevier

Journal of Biomechanics

Volume 49, Issue 8, 24 May 2016, Pages 1272-1279
Journal of Biomechanics

Microvesicles released from tumor cells disrupt epithelial cell morphology and contractility

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.10.003Get rights and content

Abstract

During tumor progression, cancer cells interact and communicate with non-malignant cells within their local microenvironment. Microvesicles (MV) derived from human cancer cells play an important role in mediating this communication. Another critical aspect of cancer progression involves widespread ECM remodeling, which occur both at the primary and metastatic sites. ECM remodeling and reorganization within the tumor microenvironment is generally attributed to fibroblasts. Here, using MCF10a cells, a well-characterized breast epithelial cell line that exhibits a non-malignant epithelial phenotype, and MVs shed by aggressive MDA-MB-231 carcinoma cells, we show that non-malignant epithelial cells can participate in ECM reorganization of 3D collagen matrices following their treatment with cancer cell-derived MVs. In addition, MVs trigger several changes in epithelial cells under 3D culture conditions. Furthermore, we show that this ECM reorganization is associated with an increase in cellular traction force following MV treatment, higher acto-myosin contractility, and higher FAK activity. Overall, our findings suggest that MVs derived from tumor cells can contribute to ECM reorganization occurring within the tumor microenvironment by enhancing the contractility of non-malignant epithelial cells.

Introduction

Early in tumor progression, extensive extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling occurs (Butcher et al., 2009, Levental et al., 2009, Provenzano et al., 2008). Reorganization of the ECM is dependent on cell-mediated collagen bundling as well as deposition of new ECM components (Even-Ram and Yamada, 2005, Friedl and Wolf, 2010). Additionally, cells can reorganize collagen into parallel fibers radiating perpendicularly to the tumor to facilitate invasion (Provenzano et al., 2006). Interestingly, ECM remodeling and reorganization is observed in the early stages of tumor progression, and even adjacent non-tumoral sites show signs of ECM remodeling (Theret et al., 2001, Zhu et al., 1995). While fibroblasts are often described as mediating these changes (Cukierman and Bassi, 2010, Dumont et al., 2013, Mao et al., 2013), healthy epithelial and myoepithelial cells residing near the premalignant lesion could also contribute to these changes and respond to signals from cancer cells.

There is now a large body of evidence that shows that cancer cells can interact and communicate with healthy cells present within the local microenvironment (Al-Nedawi et al., 2008, Al-Nedawi et al., 2009, Brucher and Jamall, 2014). Interestingly, cells have the ability to release extracellular vesicles that appear to play an important role in the transfer of signaling proteins and cargo to other cells (Al-Nedawi et al., 2008, Al-Nedawi et al., 2009). There are two known types of extracellular vesicles, namely the smaller exosomes (<100 nm) and larger microvesicles (MVs) (Santana et al., 2014). While exosomes are produced by a wide variety of cell types, production of significant quantities of MVs appears to be limited to tumor cells (Santana et al., 2014). MVs shed by tumor cells can contain ECM components, growth factor receptors, cytoskeletal proteins and signaling molecules as cargo (Antonyak et al., 2011, Grange et al., 2011). When these MVs interact with non-tumorigenic cells, they can promote transformation-like characteristics such as increased cell growth, survival, and migration (Antonyak et al., 2011, Webber et al., 2010). Of note, recent evidence suggests that tumor-shed extracellular vesicles can prime the pre metastatic niche (Costa-Silva et al., 2015, Grange et al., 2011, Peinado et al., 2012), suggesting a role for extracellular vesicles in modifying the local microenvironment (Costa-Silva et al., 2015). However, it remains unclear whether MVs can contribute to the local ECM remodeling that occurs during the establishment of the pre-metastatic niche.

In the work reported here, we investigated the effect of MVs on non-malignant epithelial cell-mediated matrix reorganization within in vitro 3D collagen scaffolds. MCF10a epithelial cells were cultured in the presence of MVs collected from highly aggressive MDA-MB-231 carcinoma cells. Notably, the MCF10a cells cultured in 3D collagen scaffolds showed altered cell morphology and increased ECM reorganization following their treatment with MVs. In addition, 2D traction force microscopy measurements reveal that MCF10a cells generate more traction when they are cultured in the presence of MVs. Correspondingly, we observe a MV-mediated increase in both focal adhesion kinase (FAK) and myosin light chain phosphorylation. Overall, our results indicate that MVs shed by tumor cells can induce phenotypic changes in non-malignant epithelial cells, resulting in increased contractility and modifications to the ECM in the local microenvironment.

Section snippets

Cell culture and reagents

MCF10A mammary epithelial cells (American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), Rockville, MD) were maintained in Dulbecco׳s Modified Eagle׳s Media supplemented with 5% horse serum, 20 ng/mL EGF (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), 10 mg/mL insulin, 0.5 mg/mL hydrocortisone, 100 ng/mL cholera toxin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), and 1% penicillin–streptomycin (Invitrogen). All cells were cultured at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Primary antibodies used were rabbit anti-phospho Y397 FAK (p-FAK, #3283) and anti-phospho

MVs can diffuse inside a collagen gel

Considering that a 3D collagen gel can be a barrier for efficient diffusion of macromolecules (Kihara et al., 2013), we investigated the extent to which MVs can penetrate the gels. MVs generated by MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells were isolated as described in the Section 2. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) was used to determine the size of the isolated MVs. DLS measurements yielded an average MV diameter of ~300 nm (Fig. 1A). Of note, the filtration step was sufficient to eliminate the smaller

Discussion

While data exists regarding how extracellular vesicles are generated (Antonyak et al., 2012, Hanson and Cashikar, 2012) and the function of exosomes (Katsuda et al., 2014, Minciacchi et al., 2015), there is little information regarding the function of MVs. It is known that MVs shed by tumor cells can confer to healthy cells characteristics reminiscent of transformed cells (Antonyak et al., 2011, Webber et al., 2010). Here, we show that MVs also induce morphological changes in non-malignant

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare there are no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Cornell Center on the Microenvironment & Metastasis through Award number U54CA143876 from the National Cancer Institute and a National Science FoundationNational Institute of Health Physical and Engineering Sciences in Oncology (PESO) award (Award number 1233827) to CAR. This work was also supported by a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship (2013155462), and Cornell Sloan and Ford foundationfellowships to MCL.

Reference (54)

  • N. Theret

    Increased extracellular matrix remodeling is associated with tumor progression in human hepatocellular carcinomas

    Hepatology

    (2001)
  • T. Alcoser

    Probing the biophysical properties of primary breast tumor-derived fibroblasts

    Cell. Mol. Bioeng.

    (2015)
  • K. Al-Nedawi

    Intercellular transfer of the oncogenic receptor EGFRvIII by microvesicles derived from tumour cells

    Nat. Cell Biol.

    (2008)
  • K. Al-Nedawi

    Endothelial expression of autocrine VEGF upon the uptake of tumor-derived microvesicles containing oncogenic EGFR

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA

    (2009)
  • M.A. Antonyak

    Cancer cell-derived microvesicles induce transformation by transferring tissue transglutaminase and fibronectin to recipient cells

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA

    (2011)
  • M.A. Antonyak

    R(h)oads to microvesicles

    Small GTPases

    (2012)
  • M.A. Antonyak et al.

    Microvesicles as mediators of intercellular communication in cancer

    Methods Mol. Biol.

    (2014)
  • M. Arpin

    Emerging role for ERM proteins in cell adhesion and migration

    Cell Adhes. Migr.

    (2011)
  • F. Bordeleau

    Keratin 8/18 modulation of protein kinase C-mediated integrin-dependent adhesion and migration of liver epithelial cells

    Mol. Biol. Cell

    (2010)
  • F. Bordeleau

    Keratin 8/18 regulation of cell stiffness-extracellular matrix interplay through modulation of Rho-mediated actin cytoskeleton dynamics

    PLoS One

    (2012)
  • F. Bordeleau

    Topographical guidance of 3D tumor cell migration at an interface of collagen densities

    Phys. Biol.

    (2013)
  • F. Bordeleau

    Tissue stiffness regulates serine/arginine-rich protein-mediated splicing of the extra domain B-fibronectin isoform in tumors

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.

    (2015)
  • B.L. Brucher et al.

    Cell–cell communication in the tumor microenvironment, carcinogenesis, and anticancer treatment

    Cell Physiol. Biochem.

    (2014)
  • D.T. Butcher

    A tense situation: forcing tumour progression

    Nat. Rev. Cancer

    (2009)
  • B. Costa-Silva

    Pancreatic cancer exosomes initiate pre-metastatic niche formation in the liver

    Nat. Cell Biol.

    (2015)
  • N. Dumont

    Breast fibroblasts modulate early dissemination, tumorigenesis, and metastasis through alteration of extracellular matrix characteristics

    Neoplasia

    (2013)
  • A.J. Ehrlicher

    Alpha-actinin binding kinetics modulate cellular dynamics and force generation

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA

    (2015)
  • Cited by (19)

    • Microvesicles as drug delivery systems: A new frontier for bionic therapeutics in cancer

      2023, Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology
      Citation Excerpt :

      This method is easy to operate and suitable for primary experiments. Bordeleau and others [32] obtained MVs secreted from MDA MB 231 cells through serum starvation. However, due to the different tolerance of each cell type, pre-experiment is indispensable to control starvation time and ensure the survival of cells.

    • Microvesicles – promising tiny players’ of cancer stem cells targeted liver cancer treatments: The interesting interactions and therapeutic aspects

      2021, Pharmacological Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      EVs, a mediator of cell-to-cell communication, were found to carry matrix metalloproteinase(MMPs), hence take part in ECM remodeling and degradation, thereby contributing to tumor progression explicitly metastasis [35]. In a 3D cell culture model, microvesicles (MVs) derived from aggressive MDA-MB-231 carcinoma were able to induce phenotypic changes of non-malignant epithelial cells (MCF10a) including enhanced contractility, which in turn enhanced tumor metastasis capacity and ECM remodeling as well [74]. The role of above mentioned supporting cells of CSC niche in regulating MVs release and uptake is another interesting aspect.

    • Mechanobiology of microvesicle release, uptake, and microvesicle-mediated activation

      2020, Current Topics in Membranes
      Citation Excerpt :

      The role of MVs in cell signaling and disease progression are newly emerging. The transfer of cellular cargo via MVs promotes extracellular matrix and vascular remodeling, recruits tumor-promoting stromal cells, and induces transformed phenotypes within recipient cells (Antonyak et al., 2011; Bordeleau et al., 2016; Huaitong et al., 2017; Jiang et al., 2019; Kawamoto et al., 2012; Menck et al., 2015; Schwager et al., 2019). However, the roles of altered cell contractility, cell migration, and matrix stiffness in MV release, MV uptake, and downstream MV signaling have largely been ignored.

    • BM-MSCs-derived ECM modifies multiple myeloma phenotype and drug response in a source-dependent manner

      2019, Translational Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      The ECM is a composite of proteins, collagens, proteoglycans, and glycosaminoglycans that assemble into a 3D structure that serves as a binding interface for multiple proteins.2 This scaffold is dynamic in structure, rigidity, and composition and is continuously altered by cell secretion, various modifying enzymes, incorporation, and extraction of multiple growth factors, extracellular vesicles, and more.3,4 The constant change in ECM creates an information-rich signaling platform that is also niche specific in its composition and functions as an active component of healthy and pathologic microenvironments, cancer included. 4,5

    • Subcellular regulation of cancer cell mechanics

      2017, Current Opinion in Biomedical Engineering
      Citation Excerpt :

      Notably, it is now accepted that cancer cells send signals in the form of secreted extracellular vesicles (EVs) that can influence the mechanical state of other cells. Indeed, normal epithelial cells exposed to tumor shed EVs display a large increase in cellular contractility [58] (Figure 2A). Moreover, tumor shed EVs can induce fibroblast activation, leading to more contractile α-smooth muscle actin rich tumor associated fibroblast [59,60].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text